Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

ORIGINS OF THE COLD WAR

This is an excerpt from the paper...

One's interpretation of how and why the Cold War began will depend, in large part, on which of two views of the meaning of the Cold War is given greater credence: was it fundamentally an ideological conflict, or a balance-of-power struggle? Was it a unique dialectic event in history - a collision of belief systems that can never recur in the same way again? Or was it one instance of a recurrent pattern in the history of states?

Halle places himself firmly on the side of the balance- of-power viewpoint:

It is essentially true, them, to say that since the end of the eighteenth century four great wars have been fought to maintain or restore the European balance of power. The fourth was the Cold War, which began almost immediately

after World War II (Halle, 1967, p. 2).

In this view, ideology was more a system of internal justification for governments than a driving force in the conflict. Had Soviet Russia been, say, social-democratic, the Cold War would still have happened more or less as it did, simply because the U.S. and the Soviets were the only big boys left on the block after World War II.

The alternative argument is that ideology is indeed a driving force - that, as Zbigniew Brzezinski argues, ideology plays a "persisting and important role" in shaping Soviet policy (Graebner, 1976, p. 77). This ideology, to Brzezenski, drives Soviet policy to an

. . . apocalyptic image of the future and the belief in the inevitable trium

. . .
or perhaps simply without the personality of Stalin, who embodied all that was most frightening about Soviet ideology), the tensions could have been managed without producing a long-term crisis atmosphere. It was the West's and Stalinism's (or Stalin's) mutual abhorrence that caused this tension to erupt almost uncontrollably into the Cold War. PERSISTENCE OF THE COLD WAR It has been suggested above that a symbolic or benchmark date for the beginning of the Cold War can be fixed at Winston Churchill's "Iron Curtain" speech in March, 1946. At this point, a Western leader traditionally associated with a cool balance-of-power outlook declared that the West could not do business as usual with the Soviets; that relations were entering a state of confrontation rather than of manageable tension. The underlying reason for this state of confrontation was ideological: on the one side, Stalin and his ideologists held that the Soviets and the West could not exist in balance, but that one prevail and the other decline; on the other, Western leaders and Western (particularly American) public opinion concluded that their way of life was threatened unless Stalinism was eradicated or at least decisively checked. The personal role of Sta
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Cold War, Soviet Union, Iron Curtain, Soviets West, Zbigniew Brzezinski, World War, Carl Gustavson, Joseph McCarthy, II Americans, cold war, Union Krushchev, halle 1967, world war, iron curtain, soviet union, world war ii, war ii, iron curtain speech, curtain speech, graebner 1976, , middle 1950s, cold war rhetoric, graebner 1976, wartime allies potential,
Approximate Word count = 2107
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$