Reasons for the US Trade Deficit
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Recently, the Commerce Department announced that the U.S. merchandise trade deficit narrowed to a seasonally adjusted $32.78 billion in the fourth quarter on a balance-of-payments basis from a revised $35.97 billion in the third quarter. Despite this news, many policymakers see the U.S. trade deficit as a symptom that the country has lost its edge in international competition. They believe that foreign competitors are able to take markets away from U.S. producers because they have some important advantages. In particular, they have lower wages, superior technology, and "unfair" trade practices. A similar scenario in the Reagan years created a rise in protectionism, and some worry about history repeating itself. According to Harold B. Malmgren, a Washington, D.C. economist, as the trade deficit increases, the United States might embark on a vigorous program of unilateral actions and threats of action to force other governments to adjust. Many analysts do not believe the trade deficit is due to lower wages, superior technology, and "unfair" trade practices. On the contrary, they think the trade deficit is due to certain macroeconomic fundamentals, such as the U.S. government budget deficit and the country's investment and savings patterns. Furthermore, they think that the trade deficit is not necessarily the best way to judge U.S. competitiveness. More important factors to consider would be price competitiveness and productivity.
. . .
es had caused the pervasive decline in the early 1980s, they would have had to change uniformly and suddenly around 1981, which they did not.
Of all the U.S. trading partners, Japan continues to be singled out for having the most unfair trading practices, but many think it is doubtful that such policies have been a major cause of U.S. trade deficits. This is because the Japanese market has become somewhat more open over the past decade. Even if existing foreign restriction on U.S. exports were completely removed, most estimates suggest the U.S. would reduce its trade deficit by only modest amounts.
Many analysts believe that Japan's trade surplus with the United States is rooted in Japan's languishing economy and not in barriers to cutting-edge U.S. exports, such as commercial jet aircraft and pharmaceuticals. At the same time that recession-battered Japanese consumers and businesses are buying fewer imported goods from the United States, a resurgent U.S. economy is increasing its imports from Japan.
Other economists believe that trade relations between the United States and Japan is too narrowly focused on the trade deficit. It ignores emerging markets that offer excellent export potential. According to this view,
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Europe Japan, Relative GDP, Washington DC, Commerce Department, Japan American, United Japan, Reagan Administration, trade deficit, Street Journal, Business Week, trade practices, unfair trade, unfair trade practices, trade deficits, merchandise trade, Economics January, labor costs, merchandise trade deficit, deficit due, trade deficit due, march 1994, price competitiveness, government support, trade deficits 1980s, lower wages superior,
Approximate Word count = 1398
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Reasons for the US Trade Deficit
|