Marx, Durkheim and Society
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Marx considered his work to be scientific, based on economics and history, and Durkheim considered his to be scientific, based on an ordered analysis of the moral issues underlying the division of labor. Both Marx and Durkheim began where all truly scientific inquiry must begin--at the beginning. Durkheim writes:What reconciles science and morality is the science of morality, for at the same time as it teaches us toi respect moral reality it affords us the means of improving it. . . . Here as elsewhere, science presupposes the entire freedom of the mind. we must rid ourselves of those ways of perceiving and judging that long habit has implanted in us (Durkheim Division xxviii-xxix). Durkheim does not question the existence of moral realuity, but he does begin with a questioning of everything which has been assumed to describe and analyze it previously. Marx similarly advocates a starting from the beginning, a tearing down of what has come before: And the socialist principle itself represents, on the whole, onky one side, affecvting the reality of the true human essence. we have to concern ourselves just as much with the other side, the theoretical existence of man, in other words to make religion, science, etc., the objects of ouyr criticism (Marx 13). The latter excerpt is from a piece called "For a Ruthless Criticism of Everything Existing." Both Marx and Durkheim follow the basic processes of scientific inquiry by questioning the very foundation of their subject
. . .
ch is handed down to each generation from its predecessor, a mass of productive forces, capital funds and conditions. . . . (Marx 164).
Both Marx and Durkheim saw societry as an organic entity, an entity which coresponded in important ways to a biological entity, or at least a material entity which obeyed certain laws of growth and development and change. Durkheim saw in society a need for non-revolutionary change, whereas Marx saw a need for revolutionary change, but both saw great forces at work which corresponded to the scientific forces at work in a material or biological entity. Both men effectiveky argued that their studies were based on science because, essentially, the subjects they studies adhered to scientific laws and principles.
4. Marx believes that what is wrong with modern industrial society is the division between the classes which can only be solved by revolution and the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat and then the perfect communist or socialist state without class divisions. Durkheim, on the other hand, believes that the freedom of the individual is threatened by laws and regulations which are necessary for social solidarity but which cost the individual his autonomy.
Marx argues that
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Marx Durkheim, Durkheim Division, Accordingly Durkheim, , division labor, marx durkheim, social solidarity, modern industrial, durkheim division, York Norton, Free Press, individual autonomy, productive forces, marx, durkheim writes, society economy, modern industrial society, xxx marx durkheim, related division labor, considered scientific based,
Approximate Word count = 1498
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Marx, Durkheim and Society
| Marx, Durkheim and Weber |
1446 words |
| Capitalism ampamp Marx, Durkheim and Weber |
1446 words |
| Concept of Religion of Marx, Durkheim, Freud ampamp Weber |
2546 words |
| Marx, Durkheim, and Weber |
2798 words |
| Marx ampamp Durkheim |
2299 words |
| Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber: Sociological Views and ... |
1402 words |
| Sociological Work of Durkheim, Marx and Barthes |
1356 words |
| Durkheim, Marx ampamp the Division of Labor in Society |
1484 words |
| Emile Durkheimamp39s View of Society |
1287 words |
| Marxamp39s Analysis of Industrial Society |
1087 words |
|