Right to Die Viewpoints
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Arguments have prevailed for years between the different doctrines or viewpoints regarding an individuals "right-to-die." However, they have become more strident and more shaded as public opinion begins to shift away from America's growing dependence on modern medicine technology and back to the historical roots of euthanasia: A dying person has the right to have his or her life ended by another if that is necessary to avoid suffering (Callahan, 1988, p. 398). The purpose of this paper will be to review the issues involved in euthanasia and the right-to-die movement, arguing that legal guarantees are needed to ensure its implementation it so desired. To dramatize this new shift in public opinion, a Harris Poll in 1973 found that 53 percent of those polled opposed actively ensuring euthanasia. In 1985, 61 percent of those polled supported it. The Western tradition that has rejected this belief is breaking down (Callahan, 1988, p. 397). California, in 1987, got as far as defeating an initiative to put a euthanasia referendum on the ballot, and the Netherlands now can legally give life-terminating drugs to terminal patients at their request. While passive euthanasia, which allows people to die without heroic, life-sustaining, death-prolonging efforts, is already legal and being practiced in most of the United States, active euthanasia, the taking of some kind of action such as turning off a respirator, is finding support in public debate as a result of the following tr
. . .
accept "ordinary" means of treatment, but not to endure "extraordinary" treatment, which is determined to mean excessive physical, psychological, spiritual and financial burden and which, if given, will offer no real benefit for the patient. It rejects the stance which asserts that human life must be prolonged no matter what (Mitchell, 1988, p. 272).
Several legal cases, however, have shown that even the Catholic hierarchy is divided on the issue of withholding or terminating artificial hydration and nutrition procedures. Those opposing it are concerned about the danger of a "slippery slope," the tern coined by right-to-life groups which refers to the need to be ever vigilant lest the dignity of human life become compromised by the wonders of modern medical technology and the ethical issues it creates (Mitchell, 1988, p. 278).
As the secular movement places increased pressure on a drive for right-to-die, those directing the religious position are attempting to develop a more forceful philosophical argument to enhance their position, an argument that would apply as well to the now legal passive euthanasia.
Right-to-life groups, on the other hand, oppose the popular new document, the "living will." Created and supported by
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Catholic Church, Technology Assessment, Harris Poll, Dying Caught, , Supreme Court, Hippocratic Oath, References Callahan, Medicare Callahan, Jr J, callahan 1988, allowing die, medical technology, killing allowing die, passive euthanasia, assessment 1987, technology assessment, office technology, allocation resources, killing allowing, modern medical technology, technology assessment 1987, office technology assessment, terminally ill, 1987 life-sustaining technologies,
Approximate Word count = 1851
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Right to Die Viewpoints
|