The Supreme Court's Modern Policy Role The Su

The Supreme Court has assumed a very important policy role in the United States government as a result of the philosophy underlying the role of law in the United States and as a result of its constitutional role in government. The framers of the Constitution opted for a majority rule government, limited by protection of minority rights. This was meant to prevent tyranny by both the minority and the majority. In order to achieve this goal, the law must be obeyed without exception. Only the rule of law can result in liberty because it is the cement of a free society. This means that dissenters to the majority rule must also accept dissent to their dissent.

The Constitution gave the role of arbiter to the Supreme Court. The framers settled on the idea that the best arbiter of what is and is not constitutional would be the judiciary, for this would be a natural role for that body. In order to exercise this role, the Court needed the power of judicial review, or the ability to hold a law or action unconstitutional and unenforceable. Judicial review was not a power enumerated in the Constitution. However, it was a traditional power of the judiciary and the Court spelled it out in Marbury v. Madison. After Marbury, the debate over the power of judicial review vanished from the political scene.

The importance of the rule of law and the role of the Court in determining what comes within the rule of law has meant that the Court has an

Related Essays

The Modern Corporation and Political Thought .... Bowman, S. The Modern Corporation and .... holding in PG&E is disturbing because it seems to contradict the holding in other recent Supreme Court opinions and .... (2910 12 )

The Warren Court .... appointed to the Court by Harry S. Truman .... intent of framers to "correspond with modern societal ethics .... a role was not within the auspices of the Supreme Court. .... (2434 10 )

Legal Principle of Judicial Review The purpose of this research is .... issue of judicial review, however, is that, in the modern period, particularly .... process and that judges, particularly the unelected Supreme Court, should not .... (4150 17 )

History of US Abortion Policy .... consensus among Americans on any issue has become a hallmark of modern society, an .... Abortion decisions of the Supreme Court, 1973 through 1989 .... Finkbine, S. (1994 .... (5544 22 )

Involuntary Commitment: The civil rights of the mental health .... The Supreme Court requires clear and convincing evidence for .... Should the court apply the more rigid standard? .... LT, Schiller, M., and Hayward, S. (1996, September .... (5055 20 )

Lobbying & the American Governmental System .... Cox, A. (1976). The role of the supreme court in American government. .... Galub, AL (1986). The Burger court, 1968-1984. .... Glazer, S. (1989, December 15). .... (3820 15 )

conomic rights because of their special place in the political thought underlying Anglo-American society. In fact, Justice Harlan Stone stated in a famous footnote that any laws infringing upon the five guarantees of the First Amendment (religion, speech, press assembly, and petition) may deserve greater judicial scrutiny than other types of legislation. It is ironic, in light of developments during the 1960s and 1970s, that the application of substantive due process analysis to economic rights was strongly criticized as judicial legislation. Nowhere did the Constitution state that certain rights were so important that any legislation infringing upon them was unconstitutional. In fact, a strict reading of the due process clause would indicate that infringement of these rights only had to be accompanied by due process. This suggested that the clause demanded procedure, rather than no infringement at all. Once the substantive due process doctrine was rejected with regard to economic rights, however, it began to be applied to personal liberties. This meant that the new justices were not rejecting substantive due process analysis, but swapping the kinds of rights covered by the analysis. This was a major policy change on th

Category: Government - T