| |
| |
Linguistic Features of Slang |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
| |

This research examines linguistic features of slang and ways in which it affects the language experience of English language learners (ELLs). The research will set forth the context in which slang becomes relevant to and reaches meaning with nonnative speakers of English and then discuss issue fronts that can have an impact on such speakers' experience of comprehension. At a time when unprecedented numbers of immigrants are entering the United States, the need for effective communication is difficult to overstate. That entails learning English, the operative language in the United States. And learning English entails learning not only formal language but also slang, which is bound up with both social and linguistic conventions that may be unfamiliar to the ELL but essential for comprehension. It is both necessary and challenging to make connections between words, symbols, and expressions and those who use them, and to reach linguistic clarity based on shared understandings between speakers and auditors about the social context in which certain words are used and certain meanings are structured. It is the thesis of this research that context--physical, social, psychological, emotional--is the decisive sociolinguistic factor of communication effectiveness, and that mastering context may prove more important for mastering the language than mere attention to linguistic phonemes. All language, of course, is symbolic. Slang, however, is a special
Related Essays
Linguistic Behaviors .... These nonstandard grammatical features differentiate speakers according to social phenomenon and not according to purely linguistic criteria. .... (894 4 )
Second Language Learning .... For example, the Silent Way aims at sensitizing (in Madeleine Ehrman's word) students to a holistically perceived set of linguistic features into an .... (3118 12 )
Cellphone Genre Change .... Watters (2005) call similar content and form where content refers to themes and topics and form captures similar observable physical and linguistic features. .... (1240 5 )
Group Cohesiveness and Academic Language .... Spanos, G., Rhodes, N., Dale, T. & Crandall, J. (1988). Linguistic features of mathematical problem solving: Insights and applications. .... (2368 9 )
Spanish Culture & Customs & Language Education .... Lots of linguistic features correlate with the context in which they are used. The setting determines how language will be used. .... (2184 9 )

es" that introduce linguistic outgroups to the special meanings of the speech. Speakers who explain or otherwise share information about the meaning of the slang expression are inviting members of the outgroups into the culture from which the slang previously had excluded them (Gibbs & Nagaoka, 1985). That is reflected in an informal yet real-world-relevant study of slang or "lingo," that is used by a variety of Internet message "in-groups," from law enforcement officers to science fiction fans (Dunn, 1997). However, Dunn's text suffers from the fact that it is not keyed to a systematic index.
The fact that slang does enter the common language is one thing. How it enters is an equally relevant point. That is where context assumes increasing importance. Spears's (1992) compilation of slang and idiomatic expressions illustrates why, although not in the way the author intends. Just as Dunn's text suffers from a lack of an index, Spears's text suffers from a failure to contextualize the expressions it covers. Despite the title of the work, the compilation is alphabetical and not contextual. That is, slang/idiomatic expressions are not grouped according to the most likely social context in which they would be used. Take the example of
Category: Misc - L
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Gibbs Nagaoka, , Dumas Lighter, Similarly Cockney, Umpire Cockney, World ELL, Night Live, Wide Web, Linguistic Circular, April-June Getting, social context, dumas lighter, lighter 1978, gibbs nagaoka, dumas lighter 1978, text suffers, dunn's text suffers, nagaoka 1985, dunn 1997, wayne's world, specific social, ell difficulty decoding, gibbs nagaoka 1985, pass common,
= 1451
= 6 (250 words per page)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
| |
Click Here
to Get Instant Access to over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
"Your site was very helpful and gave me the details I needed in order to complete my essay!!!"
|
Mike F. |
| |
|
"This site is an excellent vehicle for quick referrences. Thanks a bunch!"
|
Carla T. |
| |
|
"Great site, I got a lot of new ideas I would have never thought of before."
|
Nate A. |
| |
|
"I love this site!!!"
|
Marie H. |
| |
|
"Thank you for making such a high quality site! Your papers are the best I have seen around"
|
Debbie B. |
| |
|
| |
|
|