Qualifications for Public Colleges Admission
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Qualifications for admission to public colleges and universities have been set in terms of academic criteria, including testing and achievement in lower grades, but other criteria are also used. Non-academic criteria range from residency requirements for state facilities to affirmative action requirements to increase the participation of minorities and women, though these rules are currently under fire from certain quarters as ineffective or unfair. Colleges have long considered a variety of non-academic issues in deciding on candidates. Some colleges require essays in which the student is expected to indicate his or her attitude or to recount aspects of their life that might make them more in need than others. Likewise, money has always been a non-academic requirement, and those who cannot afford a higher education can often achieve it by winning a place in a scholarship program. Sports achievement is still another non-academic element that can be a deciding factor. Some non-academic factors should be taken into account in deciding who is to be admitted to the college or university, and criteria such as life experience, ethnic and racial background, and some non-academic achievements because having people of diverse backgrounds and abilities in the mix benefits all students, exposing them to a wider variety of the world than they would encounter in college otherwise. This idea has been opposed by a number of people not because they believe students should not be expo
. . .
a whole. Beneath the public university is the community college and similar institutions. Presumably, nearly every student who wants an education can find a place somewhere in this hierarchy. The issue is whether non-academic standards should apply at the higher levels, and the answer is that they should because they again enhance the educational experience for all by broadening the mix of students.
An opposing view is offered by political analyst Dinesh D'Souza, who calls for a system that is strictly a meritocracy. He says that nearly all American universities have changed their admissions rules to give a sizable portion (he does not define what this means) of their slots to students from certified minority groups who have considerably lower grade point averages and standardized test scores than white and Asian American applicants who are refused admission. He offers statistics that do show that members of certain minority groups have a higher probability of being admitted than whites or Asian Americans when all things are otherwise equal, though it is not clear what percentage of these students have the considerably lower grade point averages and test scores he refers to earlier. He also finds that minority group member
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
, Supreme Court, Probe Reveals, Sins Admission, Sanoff Glastris, Asian Americans, James Wilson, Dinesh D'Souza, Racial Preferences, Asian American, affirmative action, non-academic criteria, test scores, segment population, public university, whites asian americans, asian americans, broadest segment, minorities women, whites asian, seeking candidates, affirmative action program, broadest segment population, opportunity broadest segment, considerably lower grade,
Approximate Word count = 1632
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Qualifications for Public Colleges Admission
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
