Las Casas and Sepulveda
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Discuss the controversy between Las Casas and Sepulveda. What were their differing positions on the rights and obligations of Spaniards vis-à-vis Indians? How did both authors characterize indigenous Americans? On what basis did they frame their arguments?The question of Spanish responsibility for and over the people of The New World raised theological, political, and philosophical discussion and debate—most notably between Juan Gines de Sepulveda (1490-1573), a Spanish humanist scholar who had never visited The New World, and Bartolome de las Casas (1474-1566), who himself had been an early Spanish Resident in the Americas. Their Debate at the Council of Valladolid (1550-51) exposed stark differences in their opinions of Spanish responsibility to the natives. Where Las Casas argued that the Indians were inherently good, Sepulveda presumed that they were barbaric, and barely human. Thus, Sepuveda argued, the Spanish had made a "Just War", because the Indians were truly less than human. But, while Sepulveda's opinion was based upon the writings of classical authors like Aristotle, it was Las Casas who had based his opinion on personal experiences, and was
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Latin America, Gibson Métraux, Las Casas, Discuss Columbus's, Aztec Empire, Casas Sepulveda, Empire Spanish, Spanish Aztec, War Indians, Council Valladolid, las casas, aztec empire, empire spanish, aztec empire spanish, conquest aztec empire, conquest aztec, spanish conquest aztec, various methods, people world, eye-witness accounts, slave resistance, methods resistance, spanish responsibility,
Approximate Word count = 787
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page)
|