Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Productivity and Profit Sharing

This is an excerpt from the paper...

Productivity is a major concern in the 1990s of all profitoriented organizations, regardless of size (Rothschild, 1993, pp. 1718). Productivity levels within an organization are the product of a combination of physical, financial, and human resource inputs (Miles and McCloskey, 1993, pp. 4045).

How best to attain productivity improvements is an issue of both concern and dispute. Among the many proposed solutions to the productivity problem, one suggested approach to improved productivity is the formation of selfdirected work teams within organizations to replace the more traditional hierarchical structure (Wellins, R. S. (1992, pp. 2428). An older remedy that is receiving renewed attention is the use of profitsharing to boost productivity (Collins, 1993, pp. 77104).

Some organizations have developed productivity improvement programs that include elements of both team building and profit sharing (Schatz, 1992, pp. 127128). This research examines the effectiveness of productivity improvement strategies that contain elements of both team building and profitsharing.

A concern with organizational performance is one of the more significant of the problems which confront organizational managers in the last decade of the twentieth century (Hakim, 1993, pp. 4649). The costs to an organization of substandard performance involve profit deterioration, the diversion of financial and human resources f

. . .
elates productivity to output per labor hour of input (Forbes, 1985, p. 49). Improshare is also popular with employees. While an Improshare Plan at a Firestone Tire & Rubber plant failed to provide an annual bonus payment one year, the workers, nevertheless, demanded that the plan be retained (Forbes, 1985, p. 50). Nationally, a General Accounting Office study of 1,000 gainsharing plans (Scanlon, Rucker, Improshare, or profitsharing) found that those plans that had been in force for fiveyears or longer averaged 29 percent savings in labor costs, while those plans which had been in force for less than fiveyears averaged 8.5 percent savings in labor costs (Cooper, 1992, pp. 471490. Gainsharing organizations also reported 47 percent fewer employee grievances than the national average, and absenteeism and turnover rates which were 36 percent lower than the national averages. The profitsharing concept is widely employed in the American automobile manufacturing industry. Regardless of the effects of profitsharing on the productivity of the industry, however, the industry has had difficult in competing with foreign manufacturers. The Boeing Company has fared much better with profitsharing by simultaneously maintaining inter
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Liverpool Wilson, Productivity Productivity, Theory Theory, Summary Conclusions, Ancona Caldwell, Elliott Jaques, Lenz Engledow, Miles McCloskey, Recommendations American, Harber Samson, team building, 1992 pp, productivity improvement, productivity gains, improvement program, productivity improvement program, profitsharing team, profitsharing team building, 1993 pp, personnel performance, performance appraisal, program based, improvement program based, implementation productivity improvement, team building concept,
Approximate Word count = 6733
Approximate Pages = 27 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Productivity and Profit Sharing

PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFIT SHARING 6711 words
Profit Sharing Plan 204 words
Motivation ampamp Reward Strategies 1460 words
Health Care Company Reward Systems 1342 words
PERFORMANCE, REWARD, AND TRAINING 1443 words
Ties Between Performance and Reward 1443 words
Effects of Employee Ownership 2543 words
LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY 2780 words
Motivation and Reward Strategy , 1493 words
Job Satisfaction In The Work Environment Ban 3240 words
Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW