Theories of Marx and Spencer
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast Karl Marx's Theory of Conflict to Herbert Spencer's Theory of Conflict. In this regard, the paper is divided into three broad sections. The first section presents a delineation and discussion of the views of Herbert Spencer while the second section presents the perspective of Karl Marx. The third and final section examines the similarities and differences between the two men's views.Herbert Spencer's Theory of Conflict Both Herbert Spencer and Karl Marx were concerned with what is known as "macrosociology". That is, their writings focused on society-wide social factors rather than on smaller units or subsets of society such as individuals or small groups. A succinct overview of Spencer's macrosocial perspective has been provided by Smelser (1980). In particular, Smelser notes that the English philosopher, Herbert Spencer, was very much influenced by the theoretical paradigms used in the nineteenth century physical sciences. The use of a biological model can be seen in Smelser's delineation of the basic thrust of Spencerian thought on societal structure and function: Spencer compared societies to biological organisms. Plants and animals are made up of a number of parts or organs that contribute to the operation of the whole . . . Like organisms, societies range from simple to complex and are made up of specialized parts such as the state, the educational system, and so on. These parts are indepen
. . .
ude whereas light skin became a symbol of domination.
Class and economy were the heart of Marx's Theory of Conflict. However, conflict was an inherent part of most of his views. For example, ideology was viewed by Marx as in terms of class conflict; ideology can be defined as a pattern of thought linking statements of fact with statements of ideals. Marx felt that there were essentially two types of ideology. First, there was the conservative type which linked statements of fact to statements of ideal in an effort to justify the status quo. Second, there was the liberal or radical ideology which linked statements of fact to statements of ideal in an effort to attack the status quo.
Interestingly, some research has been conducted on this principle. For example, Bendix (1966) studied managerial ideologies in four industrial countries. He observed that managers create ideologies that justify their control over the working class for purposes of production. Bendix noted that even in cases where the ideology stressed human relations and focused on such things as worker morale and job satisfaction, these factors were stressed only for their efficacy as factors motivating increased production.
Moreover, Kornhauser, Dubin and R
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Karl Marx, Marx Spencer, Light Keller, Das Capital, Industrial Revolution, Herbert Spencer, Dubin Ross, America Borrowing, Turner Spencer, Theory Conflict, social change, karl marx, status quo, herbert spencer, theory conflict, ruling class, light keller, light keller 1982, nisbet 1966, keller 1982, inkeles 1982, views karl marx, spencer inkeles 1982, spencer karl marx, herbert spencer karl,
Approximate Word count = 6139
Approximate Pages = 25 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Theories of Marx and Spencer
|