Application Report
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Effective problem solving requires a complex group of intellectual and emotional activities, such as planning, organizing, creative decision making, and coordinating work with the work of others. Individual thinking styles and attitudes play an important role in our ability to effectively carry out these different responsibilities. Behavior results from sensing information in the environment, processing this information by thinking about it, and them responding based on our perception of the information. This process is directly linked to the internal processes known as attitudes and thinking styles. Our thinking styles emerge based on our accumulated experiences and have a significant impact on our motivation and resulting behaviors. When approaching problem solving our decisions are based not only on rational analysis and choice, but also a group of deeply ingrained personality traits and attitudes. Because of this, in order to improve our effectiveness at problem solving we must broaden our awareness of how our personality traits impact our behavior. Once we understand the impact of our attitudes on our behavior, we are able to choose alternative courses of action by thinking before we act. There are many different personality types such as humanistic, conventional, apprehensive, oppositional, competitive and others. These personality types often overlap. My own personality type with respect to problem solving t
. . .
ferences of others, but I find that at times I can have difficulty viewing situations from the perspective of those who do not share my views or cultural background. Michalko’s Thinker Toys has made me more aware of how this can be a detriment to creative thinking. He argues that “A good way to challenge any assumption is by looking at it from someone else’s perspective” (Michalko 46). Since I have begun practicing this, I see how my former attitudes limited my creative thinking.
Organizationally, I find that a sterile environment, harsh criticism, and constant demands for quick results severely limit my creative thinking. Rigid rules in an organizational setting often prevents me from having the motivation to collect information or connect with others in ways that stimulate creative thinking. The old adage “all work and no play” keeps me from being in the right frame of mind to be able to reflect and remain introspective in order to spur creative thoughts. Such an environment is not one in which I can be creative.
Background Influences
There have been a variety of influenced in my background that shape my problem solving and creative thinking abilities. Three specific individuals have most influenced me in this manner,
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Solving Effective, Uncle Ray, Thinker Toys, Barriers Creativity, Book Dead, Tackling Challenges, Background Influences, Six Questions, Rearrange Reverse, creative thinking, thinker toys, limit creative, personality types, own reality box, thinking styles, tackle challenges, own reality, strong beliefs, reality box, spanish teacher, Speed Press, focused superior results, limit creative thinking, driven focused superior, direct driven focused,
Approximate Word count = 1956
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Application Report
|