College Athletes
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Asking the question of whether or not college athletes receive preferential treatment is a simple one to answer. YES. Yes, college athletes receive preferential treatment from academics to parking. Yes, college coaches and athletic departments and university boards are often willing to condone such favored treatment because of the multi-million dollar endorsement contracts, merchandising profits, television rights revenues, and a host of other lucrative benefits that accrue to a school with a winning football or basketball franchise. The more successful and nationally recognized university sports teams are cash cows. This is one of the major reasons why many college athletic departments are under fire for allowing athletes who are extremely skilled on the field, but not necessarily so off of it, special consideration from housing and parking to academic performance and class scheduling. True, there are some schools with a high reputation for demanding a high level of academic performance in their athletes with high graduation rates to their credit, such as Penn State University, but even at schools like these athletes receive special consideration other students do not. Further, the process occurs because of a misplaced value system when it comes to reward, “The reality is that coaches retain their jobs by winning games. And they win by recruiting players who, if not for their skills, would have the admissions doors clo
. . .
820 (400 points below the national average) (Paterno 1). Paterno blasted the judge’s decision arguing that eliminating the minimum-test scores is opening a wide gap for disreputable schools and coaches to recruit any athlete it thinks can help their team win, regardless of any academic ability. Unscrupulous coaches and athletic departments can totally exploit and athlete who is not prepared academically for college. Paterno argues that since minimum-standards have been instituted colleges have seen improvement in graduation rates, especially among black athletes. He argues taking them away takes away a tool of high school counselors and coaches who could say that only good academic performance was the route to athletics at a “big” sports school. He also argues the values are misplaced by taking away the minimum-standards. With a limited amount of resources and scholarships, he believes athletic ability will replace academic ability as a reason to admit a student—a student that prevents someone more academically prepared for college from getting in:
If you admit a poor student who’s a great athlete, are you keeping out a better student who’s a slightly poorer athlete? Can we justify forcing that better student to find loa
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Athletic Associations, Penn University, Rick Taylor, YES Yes, Georgia Tech, Sports Illustrated, Nittany Lions, Preferential Treatment, CITED Eitzen, Fish Recruits, college athletes, athletes receive, academic performance, athletic departments, receive special, special consideration, preferential treatment, college athletes receive, special considerations, coaches athletic departments, national average, below national average, below national, athletes receive special, receive special consideration,
Approximate Word count = 2255
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page)
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
