Drunk Driving Law
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Drunk driving fatalities have fallen over the past two decades in large part due to increasingly stringent drunk driving laws. Many of these new laws were enacted due to pressure and lobbying from anti-drunk driving groups like Mothers Against Drunk Drivers (MADD). MADD is credited as having been the major impetus behind President Clinton’s recent signing of legislation that redefines what legally drunk means “The legislation requires states to lower the blood alcohol level (to .08) that makes a driver intoxicated” (President 1). States that fail to comply will lose federal highway funds. Despite these advances in drunk driving legislation, drunk driving still represents the number one cause of traffic fatalities in the U.S. (President 1). Many states are now considering legislation that mandates jail time for drunk drivers who are first-time offenders while others have already passed such laws. I believe these laws are too severe and will argue why, presenting both sides of the argument in order to demonstrate why I feel my perspective is a bet
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
President Clintons, DUI California, Alternatives Drunk, Maryland DUI, NPR October, drunk driving, President Clinton, Post October, drunk drivers, MADD MADD, first-time offenders, mandatory jail, convicted drunk driving, alcohol awareness, driving laws, alcohol culture, alcohol consumption, convicted drunk, driving privileges, drunk driving laws,
Approximate Word count = 743
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Drunk Driving Law
|