r of others, and he must only contrive to avoid incurring hatred” (Machiavelli 63). Commodus’ actions are meant to win power and the backing of the people, but they are so corrupt they alienate him from them instead.
Maximus’ actions, in contrast, are those that exhibit morality, honor and duty. Maximus and Marcus Aurelius carry out actions that are for the good of the state. Instead of might makes right, both of these men’s actions demonstrate the concept of right makes right. Commodus’ actions are in stark contrast to those of Maximus and Marcus Aurelius. Commodus is bitter that his father does not view his actions in the ways he views those of Maximus, and he despises Maximus for actions that win him the love and respect of Marcus, the Senate and the people. Commodus’ actions do not ascribe to the principles outlined by Morgenthau as necessary for leadership success with respect to compromise. Morgenthau’s five prerequisites of compromise are:
Give up shadows of worthless rights for substance of real advantage.
Never put yourself in a position from which you cannot retreat without losing face, and from which you cannot advance without grave risks.
Never allow the weak ally to make decisions for you – always judge your interests for yourself.
The armed forces are instruments of foreign policy – not its master.
Government is the leader of public opinion, not its slave.
We see that through his corrupt actions, Commodus violates all five of these prerequisites for compromise. He clings t
...