Management by Objectives
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Management by Objectives (MBO) is a "synergetic approach to organizational management" which "emphasizes the importance of a supervisor and employee working together in order to craft individual goals (Stanley 2004, 9)." George Odiorne is one of the theorists most closely associated, along with Peter Drucker, with the popularization of MBO (Bearn 1996, 74). Beginning in the early 1960s, MBO became one of the hottest topics in management development, spurred by the efforts of Odiorne and Drucker, both of whom believed that the application of MBO principles to public and private sector organizations would bring about accountability, improve productivity and profitability, and facilitate strategic planning leading to a proper allocation of resources of all kinds. In the literature on management science, Paul Romani (1997, 6) states that there are "few concepts as frequently mentioned and, simultaneously, as widely misunderstood as MBO." Indeed, even the apparent "inventory" of the term is misidentified more often than not. Most people give credit to either Peter Drucker or George Odiorne. However, the term was actually coined for the first time by Alfred P. Sloan in the early 1950s. Drucker's primary contribution was to place the term in a central position and to flesh it out by emphasizing the results of managerial actions as opposed to the supervision of activities. Odiorne added to this significantly in later publications.
. . .
forces planning (Marlow and Schilhavy 1991, 31).
As articulated by Drucker and Odiorne, MBO was a system of managerial leadership in which the superior and subordinate managers of the organization identify its common goals and jointly set performance objectives to meet those goals. The result is "a set of written performance objectives that guide the actions of each subordinate for the next performance appraisal period (Bearn 1996, 75)." The objectives should be neither too difficult nor too easy and should be challenging but attainable with hard work. Further, these mutually accepted objectives provide the yardstick against which both superiors and subordinates can measure progress toward goal achievement.
MBO is seen as equally useful in for-profit and public sector organizations. Rogers and Hunter (1992, 27) reported on a meta-analysis of 30 studies on MBO in the public sector and noted positive results in every case. Productivity gains were correlated with the degree of top management commitment, from an average gain of 12.3 percent for low commitment, to a 63.3 percent gain for high commitment. The studies explored by these authors indicated that a basic requirement for successful MBO strategizing is a high level
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Marlow Schilhavy, Rogers Hunter, Third MBO, Manager's Letter, John Simpson, Drucker's Odiorne, Odiorne MBO, Organizations MBO, Consequently MBO, Institutional Distribution, romani 1997, schilhavy 1991, goals objectives, marlow schilhavy 1991, marlow schilhavy, management objectives, top management, stanley 2004, 1991 29, rogers hunter, peter drucker, schilhavy 1991 29, according marlow schilhavy, credit collection manager's, romani 1997 6,
Approximate Word count = 2499
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Management by Objectives
|