that would prevent the intrusion of urbanization into the surrounding area of the L.A. River. During storms, the waters would flow into natural channels and irrigate the lands in the environs that would be used as recreational parks for the public (Davis, 1998, p. 69).
However, the L.A. leaders chose the solution of constructing a narrow portion of the natural channel to eliminate floodwater. The L.A. leaders adopted this approach because it benefited numerous sectors. The large landowners stood to gain from this strategy because it enabled massive industrial development within the surrounding area. Furthermore, trade unions wanted flood control construction so that there would be temporary employment. In order to gain their support, the mayor implemented the more "popular" approach (Davis, 1998, pp. 69-71).
In addition to the river, extensive suburbanization without any ethical planning has led to the massive destruction of landscapes and farms (Davis, 1998, pp. 74-9). According to Davis (1998), the unethical transformation of the natural environment without recognizing the natural components can be considered a natural disaster. Like any natural disaster, these construction projects have truly left behind a trail of destruction (Davis, 1998, p. 91).
Not only has hillside development destroyed valuable landscape, it has also exposed the inhabitants to earthquakes, floods, landslides and fires. The selfish development of these areas that are
...