Same-Sex Marriage
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Throughout the continuous political agitation of the gay and lesbian movement and its success in other issues such as the custody of children and the right of adoption, same-sex couples have persistently fought for the legal endorsement of same-sex marriages (Canavan 109). Since their inception during the late 1960s, lesbian and gay rights' groups have incorporated same-sex marriages as one of their demands for legal reforms (Barclay and Fisher 332). Even though they have not succeeded in legalizing same-sex marriages, gay and lesbian groups have made significant progress in acquiring the legal and social endorsement of the validity of homosexual relationships over the last decades. For instance, homosexuals have won court cases that awarded them custody of children and granted them the right to adopt children. Just as importantly, on December 13, 1982, the Board of Supervisors of San Francisco passed the first ordinance that entitled the partners of homosexuals to health benefits, which set the precedent for similar ordinances in other cities and states (Canavan 110). In response to the progress made by the gay and lesbian movement, many conservative and religious groups have placed pressure on the state governments, which have led to the passage of laws prohibiting same-sex marriages by 29 individual governments and the federal government (Barclay and Fisher 331). Currently, only a few states such as Vermont, California and Hawaii have state laws that acknowledge mo
. . .
ll, no same-sex couples can engage in sexual acts to beget children. They emphasize that children are best able to establish close relationships with their parents and their siblings through their biological bonds. Even more significantly, opponents of same-sex marriages argue that same-sex couples cannot bring up their children in a morally and psychologically appropriate environment, which will prepare them for schooling and life. Children learn about human relationships within their households by being exposed to a series of interwoven relationships between their heterosexual parents, as well as between the individual parents and the children. Same-sex couples are not able to replicate these types of relationships in their households (Bradley). These children will not have access to both male and female models to help them develop physically, psychologically and morally (Frame 65).
Based on these two key areas, opponents of same-sex marriages strongly believe that the legal and social recognition of same-sex marriages will ultimately trigger negative domino effects that will lead to the erosion of public morality, the destruction of the institution of the traditional family and the disintegration of mainstream societ
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Barclay Fisher, Apartheid Finally, Vermont California, San Francisco, , California Hawaii, same-sex marriages, Marrying Apartheid, Beneficiaries Law, same-sex couples, Attorney Generals, gay lesbian, heterosexual couples, Same-Sex Marriages, opponents same-sex, apr 2004, institution marriage, opponents same-sex marriages, legalization same-sex marriages, legalization same-sex, human nature, sexual intercourse, 16 apr 2004, gay lesbian couples, 2003 16 apr,
Approximate Word count = 1925
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Same-Sex Marriage
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
