Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Overcriminalization

This is an excerpt from the paper...

Overcriminalization is destructive to the Criminal Justice System, tying up courts, judges, police and other law enforcement personnel and draining state and federal budgets. Many laws still exist on the books that are no longer relevant, and many are used so infrequently and only as a means to an end that they should be stricken from the books (Beale, 2005, 747-780). In particular, crimes relating to morality such as homosexuality, sodomy, and even fornication, which are against the law in many states, are moral issues between individuals and have no place in the Criminal Justice system since as long as they hurt no one. This paper will explore how overcriminalization affects state and federal systems and give examples which demonstrate the widespread extent of the problem.

Although there are times when moral issues come up in criminal law, such as in cases of rape, murder and other violent crimes, on the whole, strictly moral crimes should not fall within the jurisdiction of criminal justice (Beale, 2005, 748). These acts should be strictly between consenting individuals, and when they are, should be beyond the purvey of the law. The French Constitution, after which the American Constitution was modeled, placed constraints on criminal law such that people were to have, "the power of doing whatever does not injure another," free of criminal penalties: unfortunately this was not included in the United States Constitution (Richards, 1

. . .
isconsin carried a maximum penalty of two years jail time and a $10,000 fine. The Wisconsin woman was the first woman prosecuted for this "crime" since 1888. This charge was brought at the request of the woman's husband, showing that these crimes can be used on a whim by prosecutors (759). Recently, the Air force charged the first woman ever to pilot a B52, Kelly Flinn, and a Muslim chaplain at Guantanamo Bay, Captain James Yee, with adultery (Beale, 2005, 757). Again, the charges were used in Yee's case, as in the case of the Wisconsin woman, at the prosecutors discretion, this time to make up for not being able to make the original charge stick. He was charged with adultery, possessing pornography, and mishandling documents because the prosecutor could not prove the original charges of espionage and sedition, which carry the death penalty. Using these rarely used and ancient statutes is clearly overcriminalization. Judges and prosecutors are using their discretionary powers to select out certain people for prosecution while others do exactly the same thing every day and never get prosecuted. How can this be justice? The two military examples given of people prosecuted for adultery were not doing anything that thous
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
James Yee, Mann Act, Criminal Justice, United Constitution, Conclusion Mills, Trial Act, Justice System, Penal Code, Wisconsin Connecticut, Amanda Smisek, beale 2005, criminal justice, federal system, justice system, criminal justice system, morality laws, act criminal, federal court, criminal law, federal court system, laws books, criminal offenses, beale 2005 748, feb 8 2006, crime beale 2005,
Approximate Word count = 1449
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW