Perceptions on Infidelity

Male and Female Perceptions on Infidelity

The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between men and women's perceptions of infidelity. Specifically, the correlation between relationship status (dating and married) and infidelity views was determined. Subjects for the study included 21 dating males and 38 dating females, and 47 married males and 60 married females. The results demonstrated that while males showed more positive views toward infidelity compared to females, relationship status was not a factor. In addition, relationship status (dating and married) was positively correlated with negative views of infidelity in all cases, supporting all hypotheses. It is concluded that males and females view infidelity negatively overall, relationship status is not a factor, and males view infidelity less negatively, compared to females.

The following is an introduction to the topic of gender views on infidelity. A review of relevant literature is guided by the following research question: What is the correlation between relationship commitment (defined as dating and married) and infidelity views in men and women?

Almost all Americans disapprove of infidelity, with as many as 90 percent of them saying that it is always or almost always wrong for married people to have sex with someone besides their spouse, according to one report (Treas & Gies

. . .
l faithfulness in marriage or cohabitation, and attitudes and practices related to women's taking the sexual initiative. The variables were explored by gender, age group, and nationality. Approximately one fifth of respondents believed that a partner's temporary infidelity should be accepted, with the exception of Russian men from St. Petersburg and Estonia. In Estonia and St. Petersburg, gender differences towards infidelity were large, but they declined over time in Finland. It was found that the transition towards gender equality which is taking place in Finland and the rest of the world has been much later getting started in Estonia and St. Petersburg, and in those places is still at the stage it was in Finland in the early 1970s. Janowiak, Nell and Buckmaster (2002) looked at how infidelity is managed in different cultures. They found that in every society they sampled, women and men were equally vigilant in restricting the infidelity of their mates, and used the same tactics to do so. The methods used depended on the social complexity of the society in question, and there was a positive relationship between the complexity of the society and the frequency with which men and women sought a higher authority to deal with
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Dating Married, Chernozhukov Hong, Treas Giesen, Infidelity Abstract, Drigotas Barta, Ebony Unlike, Procedures Data, Results Results, Treas Giesen's, Infidelity Please, views infidelity, negative views, negative views infidelity, dating married, status negative views, status negative, participant status, significant positive, positive correlation, relationship status, significant positive correlation, male female, males females, female participant status, participant status negative,
Approximate Word count = 4678
Approximate Pages = 19 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Perceptions on Infidelity