Poverty and Government Policy
This is an excerpt from the paper...
It wasn't just the ketchup, although that was certainly an important part of the picture. But the ketchup was just the tip of the iceberg - if that isn't mixing our metaphors. The Reagan era ushered in not only of the idea that ketchup could be counted as a vegetable if by doing so the government could squeeze a few more dollars from people who were already poor but the idea of the welfare queen living high off the government's expense (and thus off our tax dollars) as she drove around in her fleet of Cadillacs. Sheila Collins looks at this episode as emblematic of the way in which the United States treats the poor in her book, Let Them Eat Ketchup, and the result is as illuminating as it is depressing.Collins outlines the episode that gave rise to the book's title, which is good, because many Americans have probably forgotten it and the story would be quite unbelievable if it weren't true. The episode happened in 1981, when David Stockman, then-President Ronald Reagan's budget director, David Stockman, suggested that ketchup should be counted as a vegetable. The reason for this suggestion was that a number of schoolchildren across the country - then as well as now - get part or all of their school lunches (as well as in some cases breakfasts) paid for by the federal government, the impetus behind the program was that children who were hungry or malnourished couldn't concentrate and learn in school - and grades aside, a nation should not let its children go hungry. The free
. . .
people has little real costs in our system, since the poor are largely disenfranchised.
The poor tend not to vote, they don't make campaign contributions, they are a largely element of the polity. When politicians make cuts to welfare, they are almost entirely immune from any political backlash. Those who are directly affected are too disempowered by the system already to do much of anything and those who are enfranchised - who do vote, who do contribute - are in general in favor of welfare cuts. This has allowed such cuts (or "reforms" as they are generally advertised) to be made both by Republicans like Reagan and Democrats like Clinton, who oversaw what would be some of the most devastating cuts in services to the poor that the nation has seen since the idea that the federal government must exist as a safety net was developed during the New Deal.
The strength of Collins's book (in addition to the passion that has obviously prompted her to write about this topic) is her ability to blend social and cultural criticism. She examines the ways in which the social structures of the United States tend to combine to keep those who begin in poverty in that same state for the rest of their lives (for example, the fact that schools are f
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
David Stockman, Jews Muslims, Democrats Clinton, , Eat Ketchup, Sheila Collins, Ronald Reagan's, children hungry, Review Press, ketchup counted vegetable, federal government, one's fate, eat ketchup, ketchup counted, poor people, rest lives, counted vegetable, david stockman,
Approximate Word count = 1269
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Poverty and Government Policy
|