Book and their Films: A Case Study
This is an excerpt from the paper...
People with intellectual aspirations often posit that books are better than films. But this is not true. Certainly there are some books that are better than most movies, and some movies that are better than most books. But even such a general comparison is difficult to make, for when we compare books and movies to each other we are engaging in the traveling comparison of apples and oranges. And the essential difference between the two (movies and books in this case, not apples and oranges) ensures that the process of adapting a book for the big screen is replete with 'sthetic and intellectual perils. This paper examines one particular instance of such an adaptation - the film Girl with a Pearl Earring (directed by Peter Webber), which was adapted from Tracy Chevalier's novel of the same name.One of the most important distinctions between the experience of reading a book and that of watching a film, as Seger (1992) notes, is the difference of the way in which time is dealt with by the two media. But the experiences of reading a novel is quite different from watching a film. And it's exactly this difference that fights translation into film. When we read a novel, time is on our side. It is not just a chronological experience, where someone else determines our pacing, but a reflective experience. Rarely do we read a novel in one sitting. In fact, part of the joy of reading is going back to the book. The reading, putting it down, thinking about it, sometimes reading a page twi
. . .
literary: She is playing with readers' expectations of what novels should be like by violating many of the conventions of the novel. Even as she is on one level simply telling us a story about a girl and a painting and an artist and how history changed the way in which we looked at each one of these, she is also telling a story about the ways in which we can and should tell stories. The novel is thus essentially postmodern in that it contains both narrative and meta-narrative.
The director chose to make a film that was significantly more straightforward. It is possible to make a film that both tells a story and is also a treatise on the art of filmmaking (for the art of the meta-narrative should not be considered to be something that is confined only to literature). He chose instead to create a straightforward story: The events in the story unfold in chronological order, with the pace very even throughout the film so that we have the impression that we are watching things unfold in real time. The effect is pleasing as well as visually lovely, but it lacks the intellectual sophistication of the book. The film tells a story while the book tells the story as well as ideas about the story.
This is as it should be, Morrissette (19
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Pearl Earring, Tracy Chevalier's, , pearl earring, girl pearl earring, girl pearl, Girl Pearl, tells story, Henry Holt, Chicago Chicago, telling story, book film, Peter Webber, Webber Peter, London Plume, EP Dutton, little main story, story book, little main, moments little, film tells story, morrissette 1986, film girl pearl, moments little main, reading book,
Approximate Word count = 1458
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Book and their Films: A Case Study
|