Limitations to Teaching Style
This is an excerpt from the paper...
A teacher who clearly understands the possibilities and limits of his or her teaching style can make more consistent judgments about how best to use this medium (Grasha, 1996). The literature pointed out that adults need to be taught in a manner that is different from that used to teach children. Grasha (1996), Professor of Psychology at the University of Cincinnati, wrote Teaching with Style, which describes how an understanding of teaching styles and learning styles can help faculty enhance their teaching. The model presented by Grasha was used in this study, to investigate teaching styles in Salvadorean technological institutes.Holmes (1995) reported that the curriculum must be changed in order to prepare children for the work force beyond the year 2003. The cries of the mass media, politicians, and parents include "We must change our methods of teaching," and "Our students are not properly prepared for the technologies of the future" (Holmes, 1995, p. 14). These fears may or may not be substantiated with regard to children, however adults must be considered. The truth is that adults are immediately confronted with the realities of our rapidly changing world, and they need to provide guidance to all children, so that knowledge can be transferred through many generations to come. Since the adult also needs to be trained, adult education should be viewed as an incorporated unit of the educational system. Scholars must s
. . .
nally defined for this study by the items on the Teaching Style Inventory.
Delegator Teaching Style
The delegator teacher emphasizes the development of a student's capacity to function independently. The student becomes autonomous working independently on projects or with an autonomous team. The teacher acts as a resource, only at the request of the student. This method helps the student perceive themselves as an independent learner; some students may become anxious with this method (Grasha, 1994). Delegator teaching style is operationally defined for this study by the items on the Teaching Style Inventory.
Assumptions and Limitations
Assumption and limitations describe factors that may affect the outcomes of the study or are important to interpretation of the study findings. In both cases, these are factors over which the researchers have no absolute control. Assumptions of this study are that self-reports provided by the questionnaires reflect accurate representations of the teaching styles, rather than perceptions of what might be viewed as socially acceptable.
Since this study utilized volunteer participants on an availability basis, although randomly selected from this group, it is possible that the findings may
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Teaching Style, Francis Grindle, Goldberger Tarule, Schaps Watson, Hickson Oshagbemi, Study Models, Models Sarasin, Style Scales, Learning Style, Delegator Style, teaching styles, teaching style, learning style, learning styles, grasha 1996, grasha 1994, technological institutes, sarasin 1998, social interaction, student learning, teaching style inventory, study items teaching, items teaching style, defined study items, operationally defined study,
Approximate Word count = 9684
Approximate Pages = 39 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Limitations to Teaching Style
|