Meta-Analysis of Bet-blocker articles

Yes. The article reviewed is a meta-analysis.

The discussion of justification or need for the meta-review was brief. Statistics regarding the prevalence of stable angina were presented as well as pharmacotherapy used to prevent symptoms. It was explained that first choice for treatment remains controversial and recent studies have shown risks involved with certain treatments which have led to increased controversy. Therefore a meta-analysis was needed to determine efficacy and safety of treatments.

The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of treatment for patients with stable angina, with beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, and long-acting nitrates. No formal research question.

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Discussion Limitations, Sample Randomized, Practice Findings, Results Cardiac, Study Rationale, Statistics Results, Study Purpose, Practice Despite, MEDLINE EMBASE, Review Comprehensiveness, beta-blockers calcium, calcium antagonists, beta-blockers calcium antagonists, myocardial infarction, long-acting nitrates, beta-blockers preferred, underlying theory, stable angina, beta-blockers preferred choice, advance practice, odds ratio, include beta-blockers, calcium antagonists long-acting, cardiac death myocardial, death myocardial infarction,
Approximate Word count = 715
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page)