Hurricane Katrina
This is an excerpt from the paper...
When Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans in August and September 2005, the response of government agencies was ineffective and became politically controversial. The winds of the Category 5 storm did great damage, and the city's flood-control and energy infrastructure failed. Lack of coordination and what was revealed by media reports to be lax or ineffective disaster mitigation, plus failure to recognize warnings and failure to follow disaster plans that had been put in place before the hurricane, complicated the physical destruction of the city. In addition to the multibillion-dollar losses to enterprise activity and ruined infrastructure, the human cost ran to the hundreds of thousands, particularly to socioeconomically vulnerable populations, and a loss of life numbering nearly 1,000, most of it concentrated in the city of New Orleans. This report analyzes the causes of Katrina's massive devastation in the city and discusses the nature of government response to and management of its aftermath, with a view toward forecasting possible lines of recovery and development.The physical facts of Hurricane Katrina are not in much dispute. In the last week of August, a storm that formed in the Gulf of Mexico began to approach the coast of Louisiana on a path headed for New Orleans. It reached the status of a Category 5 hurricane before making landfall, with winds in excess of 173 mph. In addition to wind there was a storm surge of water into the city, plus enough rain to crea
. . .
story of interaction between living things and their surroundings" (Carson, 1962, p. 16), wrote Carson, who argued that human technology ignored the claims of nature on the planet's ecosystem. Multiple sprays and aerosols "now applied almost universally . . . still the song of birds and the leaping of fish in the streams, [] coat the leaves with a deadly film, and [] linger on in soil--all this though the intended target may be only a few weeds or insects" (p. 18).
Together, the Cuyahoga River incident and Silent Spring lent momentum to what had been an extant but socially marginal advocacy movement that came to be known as environmentalism. Carson's text was arguably the more influential because it supplied rhetoric that was to prove transferable to a variety of environmental causes in the years that followed. By no means did all environmentalists speak with one voice, nor did all of them pursue the same agenda particulars. Nor indeed were environmental causes uniformly effective. However, environmental issues entered the public discourse on a permanent basis beginning in the 1960s. Land use and economic development became intertwined with their potential impact on or manipulation of natural resources, and by 1970, the year of t
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Rosenblatt Rainey, Grunwald Glasser, Water Act, Homeland Security, August September, Nagin Blanco, Silent Spring, Emergency Preparedness, Scientific American, Hurricane Betsey, hurricane katrina, silent spring, 2005 october, fischetti 2001, weisskopf 1990, emergency preparedness, scientific american, drum 2005, office emergency preparedness, office emergency, grunwald glasser 2005, homeland security, rosenblatt rainey 2005, evacuation sheltering plan, emergency preparedness 2000,
Approximate Word count = 3721
Approximate Pages = 15 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Hurricane Katrina
|