Battered-Person Syndrome
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This research argues that battered-person syndrome can be a legitimate defense in court, while cautioning that trivial use or overuse of such a defense could have the effect of hardening general (i.e., potential juror) attitudes against persons who are battered and who lash out against their abusers. Two hypothetical examples may help to illustrate the contention.1. If one's sibling was being abused by a spouse, one's first course of action upon being made aware of the abuse would be to do everything possible to isolate the sibling from the abuser. That would be a significant challenge because it is commonplace for people who observe abusive relationships to ask "why the woman did not leave despite opportunities to do so which seem objectively apparent to an outsider, why she continued to love someone who hurt her, or why she did not seek help from medical providers or law enforcement personnel" (Maguigan, 1998, p. 50). If the sibling could not be persuaded to leave the relationship despite chances to do so and were later charged with a crime against the abusive husband, then the challenge for a legal defense would be to explain that dynamic via expert testimony. One's inclination would be to want the sibling to have every advantage in court, including the option to benefit from expert-witness testimony that could help the court and jurors understand an account of the sibling's behavior. The content of the testimony would come down to accounting for the lashing-out without
. . .
here hackers are welcome: Using hack-in contests to shape preferences and deter computer crime. Yale Law Journal, 112, 1577-1623.
The purpose of this research is to examine whether and to what extent the government has been successful in breaking up organized crime enterprises. The answer must be an unequivocal yes and no. Why is the truly important subject matter of this essay.
There is a body of evidence showing that the U.S. government has successfully disrupted organized criminal activity, and the story is routinely told in newspaper headlines:
Sarasota, Fla.: County aids in major drug bust; A Port Charlotte man is charged with trafficking in cocaine and marijuana (Martell, 2002).
New York City: Authorities make major drug bust in South Bronx warehouse (Fortado, 2004).
Walnut Creek, Calif.: Major drug bust has ties to medical marijuana dispensaries (Delventhal, 2005).
Now consider a body of evidence that present precisely the opposite case:
Chicago: Losing the marketing battle in war on drugs (Crain, 2002).
Washington, D.C.: Report on cocaine, heroin prices suggests U.S. is losing war on drugs (Bachelet, 2004).
Las Vegas, Nev.: Startling stats continue to make the case against war on drugs (Shelden, 2003).
These op
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
, Carter Katz, Gerth Mills, Eldridge Cleaver, Retrieved September, PATRIOT Act, According Merton, Colombia Asia, Durkheim Merton, Santa Claus, computer crime, major drug, drug bust, major drug bust, retrieved september, war drugs, september 20 2005, 20 2005, division labor, law enforcement, september 20, organized crime, retrieved september 20, syndrome society law, south bronx warehouse,
Approximate Word count = 4694
Approximate Pages = 19 (250 words per page)
|