History of the Press in the United Kingdom
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The purpose of this research is to identify and discuss the main developments in the press of the United Kingdom (UK) beginning in 1945 and continuing to the present. The plan of the research will be to set forth the historical context in which the UK's media outlets evolved after World War II and to discuss the details of corporate and personal relationships that constituted the structure of press behavior over the second half of the 20th century and into the 21st.In order to appreciate the results of the evolution of the British press after World War II as seen from the standpoint of the Information Age, it may be useful to consider the context of that evolution in terms of what the UK press was not as of 1945, chiefly because of the far-reaching impact of World War II. In this environment, the press was by no means computer-driven. It was a national presence but not ubiquitous, in the manner of modern 24-hour cable programming. It was not under corporate/conglomerate ownership but decentralized and controlled by what were known as press barons, in part because they were also titled barons (e.g., Beaverbrook, Northcliffe). The UK press establishment may have had an international reach, with the reputation for mutedly decorous presentation of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) a matter of record. Even so, the grasp of British media outlets in general was not extensive. In particular, the newspaper business was fairly localized. To be sure, there were nine putativel
. . .
ets, such as the BBC and newspapers, quickly established an Internet presence. The BBC was and basically remains "a cautious guardian of official values" (Goodlad 34) chiefly because its licensing tenure was in the gift of government.
The entities identified with the public press had evolved into a structure all their own. Seymour-Ure characterizes the corporatist, cross-industry, international nature of mass media ownership of the major UK outlets.
The national dailies were bunched into eight ownership groups, headed by Rupert Murdoch, Conrad Black, the latest Lord Rothermere and others. More than in 1945, these men controlled multimedia organizations, with interests in TV, radio, film, video, computer products, recorded music and book publishing, as well as newspapers and magazines. Morever their interests were international, and they generally included non-media businesses too (Seymour-Ure 4).
The postwar media barons were no less politically partisan than their forebears of an earlier generation and, like them, were in the main conservative in temperament. However, they were on the whole more interested in compounding commercial success than in manipulating (say) election outcomes, as in prewar generations:
Commercial succ
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Guardian London, Corporation BBC, Marshal McLuhan's, Liliput Seymour-Ure, Roy Thomson, Lord Rothermere, Britain Eldridge, War II, Australian Beaverbrook, Daily Berlitz, et al, eldridge et, eldridge et al, newspaper circulation, world war ii, world war, war ii, national newspaper circulation, mass media, socially conservative, media outlets, uk press, daily mail, daily mail trust, ownership major uk,
Approximate Word count = 1605
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on History of the Press in the United Kingdom
|