loved ones, is contrasted with the poet's determination to get everything he can see or even think of. The sufficiency of grace is also bound to the key argument that closes the poem, which is the imperative of obedience to divine decree: Sighting one's material limits and living life in humility and contrition, paradoxically, hold the promise of surfeit of one's desires. As Frantzen puts it, "what the dreamer eventually learns is not to desire a materially valuated 'more and more' . . . a desire which moral theologians . . . identified as the sin of avarice" (268). According to Finch (358), this last passage implies "that the Dreamer had turned not to the Creator but to the creation." Finch also supplies relevant commentary on th
...