Slash-and-burn Agriculture
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Slash-and-burn agriculture is a common practice in underdeveloped countries. In this system, small plots of forest land are partially cleared, the cut vegetation is burned, and crops are planted in the ashes. Weeds are a significant problem when land availability is so scarce. Fertilizers used to maximize crops also maximize weed growth and thus reduce crop size. Herbicides used to control these weeds are often obtained from developed nations in which they have been banned because of possible water and soil pollution problems or adverse health effects. This paper will deal with a hypothetical situation and look at the technical, economic, environmental, and legal issues relating to sales of such herbicides to an Afrian country. Subsistence farmers in some African countries have traditionally practiced the slash-and-burn farming technique and the plots are used for one to three years and then left fallow. The primary food crops are rice and maize, with some cassava as a security crop, and vegetables that can be sold in local markets. The crops are usually grown in polyculture. Crops which require the highest nitrogen levels are grown first, then crops with lesser requirements. Once the land is depleted of its nutrients, the area is abandoned. Concerns over deforestation are prompting the governments of some African countries to subsidize farmers for purchase of fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides so that permanent farms can be established. In some cases, th
. . .
eing debated here may be to teach the farmers to use more natural forms of weed killers. Mice should be particularly effective, since corn is one of the major crops grown by the subsistence farmers. If the mice prove highly successful weed killers, no herbicide may be needed. Even if they are only partially successful, at least the amount of herbicide needed could be reduced and thus reduce concomitantly any associated health risks.
Environmentally, permanent farming is much more appealing since it reduces the amount of forest land destroyed by slash-and-burn techniques. However, there is a risk of pollution of water systems when chemicals are used in farming. Run-off occurs and underground water tables can become contaminated. Since the people living on these farms do not usually have access to purified drinking water, there are serious health concerns when chemicals are used in farming in these regions.
Permissive standards and lax monitoring allow dangerously high levels of the most widely used weed killers in tap water supplies even in America (Henderson 10-11). In Africa, in most cases no sophisticated water delivery systems exist, and water is drawn from rivers and wells which can easily be contaminated by herbicide
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Third World, , Protection Agency, Africa Low, America Henderson, World Bank, Marketing Reporter, Guelph Canada, Organic Gardening, Research Weekly, permanent farming, using herbicide, world bank, subsistence farmers, weed killers, slash-and-burn farming, weed control, health effects, health risks, detrimental health effects, world countries, third world countries, permissive standards lax, standards lax monitoring, weed control practices,
Approximate Word count = 2029
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Slash-and-burn Agriculture
|