PROPOSITION 187
California Proposition 187 & Illegal Immigrants
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This research paper documents and argues the merits of Proposition 187 (187), a ballot initiative which was approved by California voters in November, 1994. The implementation of 187 has been stayed, pending a final resolution of legal challenges to its constitutionality and validity which will ultimately be decided by the United States Supreme Court and courts in California. If 187 is held to be valid, substantial savings will accrue to the State of California in the form of reduced public costs of dealing with illegal immigrants. Even if 187 is struck down, its passage has served a useful purpose by focusing public debate on the inequitable burdens placed on California and other border states due to the failure of the federal government to cope effectively with the problem of illegal immigration. Proposition 187, which also became known as the 'Save Our State' ballot initiative, soared across the political landscape of California and the nation in the fall of 1994 like a meteor. Roundly denounced by most mainstream liberal and Democratic politicians, 187 was given little chance of passage by media pundits. Ross says that "opponents [of 187] outspent supporters by more than two-to-one" (54). The pro-187 campaign was given a major boost when it was supported by Governor Pete Wilson. Its pros and cons were debated nationally. The initiative received the support of major conservative leaders such as Pat Buchanan and was rejected by others
. . .
found that "two-thirds of all mothers giving birth in public hospitals are undocumented" (55). Rosen points out that "Congress over the past decade has sharply reduced its already limited federal aid to immigrants" in the education as well as other areas.(24). Since the composition of the Court itself has changed, it is very possible that Phyler v. Doe will be reversed.
Judge Pfaelzer acknowledged that the right, if any, of an illegal alien or members of his family to attend public schools did not extend to a university education which was a matter to be determined under state law. The California courts will have to rule on this issue.
In another case, Graham v. Richardson, Rosen says that "the Supreme Court has said that the states, but not Congress, must provide welfare benefits to citizens and aliens on equal terms" (23). California is likely to take the position that it is unfair to expect it and other border states to support with public funds "illegal immigrants that Congress refuses to acknowledge or deport" (Rosen 26). Moreover, the thrust of much pending legislation in the Congress is that the current federally managed welfare system must be reformed and that the states should be given greater latitude in deciding
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Urban Institute, Service INS, Rand Corporation, Governor Wilson, Science Monitor, America Caribbean, Unless California, Justice Department, Reform Act, Supreme Court, illegal aliens, illegal immigrants, proposition 187, illegal immigration, federal government, immigration reform, november 1994, los angeles, rescue 35, supreme court, los angeles times, inquire immigration status, economist 19 november, 534 july 1994, 19 november 1994,
Approximate Word count = 3824
Approximate Pages = 15 (250 words per page)
More Essays on PROPOSITION 187
California Proposition 187 & Illegal Immigrants
|