The Synoptic Gospel of Mark

The Gospel of Mark is generally regarded as the earliest of the Synoptic Gospels, written probably in the period 50-70 CE (Earle 1026), although some narrow the date even further to 65-67 (Cranfield 268). As Cranfield (269) establishes, Mark is most likely the earliest when it is examined in comparison with Matthew and Luke: "The substance of over ninety per cent (sic) of Mark's verses is contained in Matthew, the substance of over fifty per cent (sic) in Luke," and, further, that "there is often agreement in sentence structure and collocation of words between both Matthew and Luke and Mark or between one of them and Mark, and it hardly ever happens that Matthew and Luke agree against Mark. . . ."

The language of Mark--its explanations of Jewish customs and translations of Aramaic expressions--suggests strongly that the Gospel was written for a Gentile audience (Cranfield 268). In referring to his depiction of the Gospel as one of "action," Earle points out (1026), "This emphasis on action is appropriate in a Gospel written probably at Rome and primarily for Romans. Mark uses ten Latinisms . . . . He explains Jewish customs for his Roman readers. He does not even use the word 'law'. . . ."

The Roman connection is important because it gives weight to the widely held belief that the apostle Peter is the primary source of the oral history Mark has recorded (Cranfield 267). Early church tradition holds or implies that the Gospel was written "in the parts of Italy"

Related Essays

Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke & John Such diversity primarily stems from the differences between the three "synoptic" Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and the Gospel of John. .... (1065 4 )

The New Testament .... reason, and because they contrast so dramatically from the Gospel of John, Matthew, Mark, and Luke have collectively become known as the Synoptic Gospels (Stein .... (1823 7 )

Application of Gospel of Mark in Today's Society .... Nickle, KF (1980). The Synoptic Gospels: Conflict and Consensus. .... Women transformed: The ending of Mark in the beginning of Wisdom. .... The Gospel of Thomas. .... (4364 17 )

Survey of the New Testament .... is also interesting about the synoptic Gospels is their emphasis on the miracles and fabulous doings of Jesus, especially the Gospel of Mark, which appears to .... (1639 7 )

Mark 4: 1-20 - The Parable of the Sower and the Seed .... book of Mark are that it appears to have been the first gospel written and that it served as the textual authority for Matthew and Luke, the other two synoptic .... (3374 13 )

ed, Jesus warns them "to tell no one about Him" (v. 30), as if to say, "You do not yet understand what it is you are saying about me, how can others be expected to understand you?" In verse 31 we see the revelation of the coming death and resurrection, which Peter apparently cannot comprehend because he "took Him aside and began to rebuke Him." But Jesus responds with an even harsher rebuke, in the presence of all the apostles, in verse 33: "Get behind Me, Satan, for you are not setting your mind on God's interests, but man's." For a clearer understanding of this incident, it is necessary to turn to the author of Matthew (since Luke does not include this portion of the event), who chose to reveal Peter's rebuke of Jesus: "God forbid it, Lord! This shall never happen to You" (Matthew 16:22). This sheds much light on Mark 8:31, where the text is quite clear: Jesus tells his disciples that the Son of Man must suffer many things. Peter's rebuke, unstated in Mark (although it is possible that the text might have been "lost" over time), is an unwitting temptation of Jesus. As Nineham observes, the word "must" as it was used here in Mark is entirely consistent with "contemporary apocalyptic literature, as showing that cert

Category: Philosophy - T