The Blundering of Union Carbide

Breathing in methyl isocyanate gas kills within a few minutes. The gas works by breaking down red blood cells, eliminating the blood's ability to carry oxygen, and the lungs are unable to function. The resulting pressure on the vessels and arteries causes minor ruptures and the blood seeks escape from the body, usually through the eyes, ears, nose and throat (Avirook, 1994, 1). This is a part of the description that the world heard during the last days of 1984 as word filtered out from Bhopal India about a massive chemical leak that had emanated from a Union Carbide plant. Around midnight on December 2, 1984, the gas began leaking from the plant, and settled like a bright green cloud over the sleeping town. Within hours, 3,000 Indians were dead, and another 20,000 hospitalized. Within hours, also, the world press was hammering on the doors of Union Carbide executives around the world who answered with the then-typical response "no comment." Thus began a classic textbook case of the many, many ways a company should and must handle an industrial disaster. What is fascinating about the Bhopal Incident, as it is now referred to in press archives, is that Union Carbide executives not only refused to follow a solid crisis management plan (although it had one on the books since 1974), it refused to handle the event in an intelligent manner (Rudolph, 1986, 53). For even today, 14 years afte

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Union Carbide, Public Relations, Anderson December, Step Humanity, Tell Truth, union carbide, Incident Quickly, References Avirook, West Virginia, Quorum Books, Doran Shrader, crisis management, eubank montague 1987, union carbide india, step crisis, evans wagley, carbide india, carbide officials, company union, statement sympathy, step crisis management, union carbide officials, management plan, company union carbide, avirook 1994,
Approximate Word count = 1184
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)