The Problem of Germany: 1945-1948
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This research paper discusses the policy conflicts which arose between the United States and other Western powers and the Soviet Union over the problem of Germany during the years 1945 through 1948. Those policy conflicts and the underlying events are analyzed from the perspectives offered by different interpretations of them by traditional, realist, revisionist and neo-revisionist schools of thought. The wartime Western-Soviet alliance effectively dealt with the common Nazi German military threat. However, by the end of World War II, the victors had agreed on little more than to occupy, de-nazify and jointly administer their defeated and devastated German former enemy. The traditional approaches of the United States and the Soviet Union to foreign policy largely shaped their respective approaches to the German problem but left them ill-prepared to resolve their postwar differences over Germany. An initial period of partial cooperation was followed by a series of East-West confrontations and to a mutual hardening of positions which led to the armed division of Germany. American and other Western actions were largely motivated by fear of the spread of communist influence in Germany and elsewhere in Western Europe, which, after much uncertainty and confusion, coalesced around a policy of containing Soviet expansion based on a new 'realism.' The actions of the Soviet Union reflected the mindset of its dictator Josef Stalin whose methods largely undermined the accomplishment of
. . .
h his Long Telegram to the State Department in which he commented on "the Kremlin's neurotic view of world affairs," its morbid fears and suspicions of the West and its need for an external enemy to justify the Stalinist dictatorship at home (Chace 149-150; and Kennan 566-582). Kennan called for the long term containment by the West of Soviet expansionism. Its arrival in Washington coincided with the gradual emergence of a consensus within the American government in favor of a more forceful reaction to the perceived threat of communist expansion in Germany and elsewhere. During the spring, summer and fall of 1946 American foreign policy was undergoing a transition away from collaboration with the Soviet Union and toward containment. Kennan said that when he returned to the United States that spring "much of American opinion, at least in educated circles, was at that time bewildered and confused" (Kennan and Lukas 37). Truman was receiving conflicting advice from the anti-communist hardliners who included Kennan, Secretary of Defense James Forrestal, Byrnes, White House adviser Clark Clifford and others. At the same time, FDR's former Vice President and Truman's Secretary of Commerce Henry Wallace argued that American policy was
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Soviet Union, Kennan Lukas, Stuttgart September, Union Stalin, Berlin Blockade, Americans British, Gaddis Stalin's, Henry Wallace, Loth Gaddis, Churchill FDR, soviet union, foreign policy, cold war, western zones, eastern europe, world war, american british, kennan lukas, occupation zones, east germany, foreign policy 1943-1945, united foreign policy, traditional russian security, pursuing traditional russian, policy 1943-1945 york,
Approximate Word count = 4908
Approximate Pages = 20 (250 words per page)
|