Factors Influencing the Shape of the Constitution
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The shape of the U.S. Constitution as it was developed at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia was certainly influenced by such factors as the colonial experience, the revolt against British rule, and the failure of the earlier Articles of Confederation. Yet, the ideas embodied in the Constitution had been taking shape for some time before any of these elements had come into being. Indeed, the ideas expressed in the Constitution derived from European theorists such as John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, David Hume, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, though the manner in which these ideas were adopted by the colonists was influenced by the various elements of the colonial experience. The colonists had fled Europe precisely to avoid many of the legal features against which the Constitution would be written, such as star-chamber proceedings, restricted speech and press, and inherited rule instead of democratic selection of leaders. The solutions offered by the Federalists were opposed by the Antifederalists, and in the end each group had some influence in shaping the government and institutions developed in the Constitution.The Constitution itself would become the means to test the first federal system in the modern world. This was then an innovation in Western political theory and practice, and it would be highly influential over the next two centuries, as it continues to be today. Federalism presents a number of problems that political theorists have wrestled wit
. . .
d an even stronger central government, while Madison favored a middle course between centralization and states' rights. The differences between the two constitute a debate that has continued to this day over federal power and states' rights. In America, John Adams was the premier theorist of conservatism. He saw the republic as the best of governments. In terms of the developing debate over the Constitution, this Antifederalists considered a single assembly to be inherently faulty and subject to all the vices and frailties an individual might evince. As a solution they suggested the creation of two bodies, with the smaller elected as a council from the larger. They also recommended the creation of a balance of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Among the supposed Antifederalist writers were Samuel Bryan, Eleazar Oswald, "John De Witt," George Mason, and Richard Henry Lee.
FEDERALIST SOLUTIONS
A republic in strictest terms is a form of government in which the people exercise their power through elected representatives, while democracy is a form of government in which the people exercise their power directly or through elected representatives. The men who gathered in Philadelphia to consider
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Articles Confederation, Antifederalists Constitution, Continental Congress, Bryan Antifederalist, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Constitution Antifederalists, John Adams, Chapter II, Rights Wood, Papers Madison, form government, articles confederation, bill rights, national government, republican form, government people, legislative executive, powers legislative, powers legislative executive, federalist papers, balance powers legislative, continental congress, legislative executive judicial, executive judicial branches, form government people,
Approximate Word count = 2930
Approximate Pages = 12 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Factors Influencing the Shape of the Constitution
|