Paradigms in Sociology
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Paradigms are underlying intellectual assumptions that scientists make about their subject matter. In sociology, four distinct paradigms have emerged: social order, social conflict, social meaning, and social exchange. The first three paradigms evolved from the need for specific programs for social change. The last, social exchange, seeks to explain common behavior that leads to social order. All four paradigms deal with the relationship between individuals and society.The social order paradigm was developed by French sociologist Emile Durkheim. Durkheim considered the underlying sources of support for the dominant institutional patterns of society: society's collective beliefs and values. He understood social order to be that which holds society together. Durkheim was concerned with social solidarity and integration. Further, he insisted that the scientific method could be applied to social issues based on data about the society or the social structure itself: "Durkheim thought, sociology, unlike philosophy, could guide public policy and moral education through scientific analysis of social conditions and, he hoped, the inductive derivation of social laws" (Unit 2, 2-7). Durkheim believed in the concept of social fact, social phenomena that could be distinguished from purely individual phenomena. Social facts are phenomena that are external to the individual. Such facts include language, monetary systems, professional norms, etc. Although many of these social
. . .
in which private property would be abolished and individuals would be able to interact in communal, not merely economic, relationships.
One of the emphases of the social conflict paradigm is that the economic structure of society constitutes its real foundation. All other social institutions are built on this supporting structure: "Marx's division of society into two classes defined conflicting social interests, and these decisively shaped all aspects of social life" (Unit 3, 3-5).
Another concept central to social conflict theory is that of alienation. Marx believed that the mechanized system of production in factories had alienating consequence for workers. Machines are made by people, and they have the potential to free people from physical work, but the actual effect of the development of machines in the early days of the Industrial Revolution was to limit the opportunity of workers for creative activity. Marx believed that human survival and the fulfillment of human needs depended on productive activity in which people actively participated in transforming their natural environment. Marx argued that as a result of industrialization workers were dehumanized, forced to serve the machine instead of making the machine serv
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Durkheim Durkheim, Communist Manifesto, Spirit Capitalism, Weber Weber, Industrial Revolution, Emile Durkheim, , social exchange, Karl Marx's, exchange paradigm, social exchange paradigm, social conflict, Conflict Paradigm, Press McNeill, paradigm client-provided materials, paradigm client-provided, social meaning, conflict paradigm, social change, social reality, social conflict paradigm, client-provided materials, client-provided materials unit, social structure, conflict social meaning,
Approximate Word count = 1486
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Paradigms in Sociology
|