Importance of a Teacher Planning Curriculum
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Although no one, and no teacher, can predict the future with any certainty, people in leadership capacities such as teachers are required to make guesses about the probable future and plan appropriately. Teachers therefore need to plan their curriculum according to the more likely future their students face while at the same time acknowledging that the students have a future. The competent leader cannot plan according to past successes, as if doing so will force the past to remain with him. The most competent leader and manager, in fact, is not even satisfied with thoughts of the future, but is never satisfied, always sure that whatever is being done can be improved. The teacher will therefore choose and plan curriculum with other teachers and administrators according to the students, who they are, what their probable future is, and what lessons would be most useful for them. This means that the teacher will implement his or her own beliefs upon the student in planning curriculum. If the teacher believes the world faces nuclear war and a nuclear winter, he or she will include elements of survival tactics in the lessons. A teacher that believes the world will increasingly use computers at all levels of society will include computers in all levels of instruction. Teachers who have more than one student will also have to account for differences in the students they teach and plan the curriculum to accomodate these differences. One of the most important differences, because o
. . .
ch and what to use in teaching, without thinking also about the requirements for developing the teaching methods needed to implement these creative ideas (44). For example, the teacher may think to use a half hour TV show (which is actually only 22 minutes long) to teach the students elements of a story. What often is left out, however, are such things as connecting these skills to other lessons or standardized tests, and finding a way to keep the students focused on the lesson itself instead of thinking of it as free time and an opportunity to turn their brains off.
Teaching, Davis describes as usually involving style, not content, whereas what the teacher teaches is admittedly as important (if not more so) than how the teacher teaches. Lastly, assessment is seen as compliance to prestated demands rather than an instrument for gaining information on how to decide what to modify in the curriculum and in what way, as well as how and where to improve teaching methods (44-45). Because of this misperception, assessment often meets with resistance at the classroom level both from teachers and from students because it threatens to evaluate and judge personal (rather than professional) elements of teaching, and test scores are rarely u
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Preferred Activity, Teaching Davis, Clark Bever, , Whorf Sapir, Gulf War, Educational Record, Modified Whorfian, Luria Vygotsky, curriculum teaching, ear corn, educational record, et al, Weingartner Winter, plan curriculum, winter 1994, periods doing exactly, teacher teaches, quietly neat, neat rows, et al argue, rows periods, teacher believes world, rows periods doing, quietly neat rows,
Approximate Word count = 1803
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Importance of a Teacher Planning Curriculum
|