Create a new account

It's simple, and free.

Community and the Politics of Place

cedural government instead tended to encourage aggressive individualism which would be restrained, when necessary, by government. The highest value was placed on this individualism -- which was not at all conducive to cooperation.

Another important difference in the federalist and republican notions was the republican belief that government worked best on a small scale, i.e., a society in which there are not too many conflicting views to prevent the people's arrival at a conception of the common good. The federalists, however, welcomed the idea of a limitless frontier as a hedge against tyranny, specifically the tyranny of the majority. As Madison put it, "extend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties and interests; you make it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens" (quoted in Kemmis 17). Jefferson too believed that the apparently infinite amount of open space available in America was important in a political context for he held that agriculture (which he t

...

< Prev Page 3 of 12 Next >

More on Community and the Politics of Place...

Loading...
APA     MLA     Chicago
Community and the Politics of Place. (1969, December 31). In LotsofEssays.com. Retrieved 04:22, May 19, 2024, from https://www.lotsofessays.com/viewpaper/1694180.html