Motivational Interviewing

Introduction to Motivational Interviewing (MI)

Motivational Interviewing (MI) is described as a way of being with people that includes the following aspects: collaboration, evocation, autonomy, confrontation, education, and authority. The original MI methods included confrontational methods with applications to addictions, general medical care, health promotion, social work, and corrections. A more recent focus includes behavioral change in general. The MI counseling session includes a partnership between counselor and client that honors the expertise and perspectives of the client. The therapist provides a conducive atmosphere and coercion is avoided. It is assumed that the client has intrinsic resources and motivation for change, which can be enhanced by helping the client to express their goals, values, and perceptions. The right of the client for self-direction and informed choice is maintained. Confrontation is used to help the client become aware of their reality. Education is provided

. . .
ange. Graeber,ßMoyers, Griffith, Guajardo,ßand Toniganß(2003) conducted a pilot study that compared motivational interviewing and an educational treatment (ET) in patients with schizophrenia and alcohol use disorders.ß MI or ET were used to treat subjects who were followed up at four, eight, and 24-weeks. Findings shoed that MI resulted in a significant reduction in drinking days and increased abstinence rates, compared to ET subjects. Lewisßand Osbornß(2004) presented solution-focused counseling (SFC) and motivational interviewing.ß These authors stated that MI and SFC are similar in some respects, each represents nonpathological and health-promoting therapeutic aspects of dealing with clients. Each avoids diagnoses or labels and emphasized mental health. MI and SFC both focus on the importance of the therapeutic collaboration, which must include the use of nonjudgmental, respectful, and engaging language. MI facilitates and enhances intrinsic motivation and reduces resistance with principles of avoiding argumentation, rolling with resistance, expressing empathy, developing discrepancies, and supporting self-efficacy. SFC is a brief approach based on solutions rather than problems. This approach encompasses the belief
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Miller Rollnick, Alternatively MI, MI Rogers', Ivey Ivey, Interviewing MI, MI Summarization, MI SFC, MI REBT, MI Phase, MI Unconditional, motivational interviewing, rogers' client-centered, client-centered therapy, rollnick 2002, client-centered approach, rogers' client-centered therapy, miller rollnick 2002, miller rollnick, irrational beliefs, helps client, mi rogers' client-centered, ivey ivey, counselor helps client, ivey 2003, ivey ivey 2003,
Approximate Word count = 2652
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Motivational Interviewing