Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Clean Air Act of 1990 This paper will briefly dis

This is an excerpt from the paper...

This paper will briefly discuss the amendments to the Clean Air Act, passed by Congress in 1990. The discussion will include a description of the Act, the changed regulatory philosophy reflected in the Act, the political maneuvering necessary to pass the Act, and the subsequent implementation of the Act. It is still too early to determine the effectiveness of the Act since many of the regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency under the Act have yet to go into effect. The last part of the paper will therefore highlight the possible consequences of the Act, as suggested by observers.

The 1990 Clean Air Act is actually a series of amendments to the Clean Air Act of 1970. These amendments, however, virtually replace many of the provisions of the 1970 Act and comprise, in and of themselves, an entirely new set of laws regarding air pollution. The 1990 Amendments were drawn up in response to EPA studies which showed that 1) 96 cities had yet to attain the national standard for ozone set in 1970, 2) 41 cities did not meet the standard for carbon monoxide, and 3) 72 cities did not meet the standard for particulate matter. In addition, the EPA had only regulated 7 hazardous air pollutants, out of a potential list of several hundred, due to controversy over, and legal challenges to, the 1970 provisions (Reilly, 1991, p. 3). The purpose of the new amendments was to provide a flexible, results-oriented law, one which did not legislate the part

. . .
e need for expensive and environmentally disruptive new water-supply projects. Third, there is the elimination of government subsidies; one example is the subsidizing of below-cost timber sales, which recover less money than is spent in making the timber available. Such subsidies encourage excessive timber cutting (Stavins & Whitehead, 1992, p. 11). Finally, there are tradable pollution permits, as illustrated by the example of the acid rain provisions in the 1990 Act (Stavins & Whitehead, 1992, p. 10). Under the relevant provisions of the 1990 Act, the government established overall levels of allowable sulfur dioxide, and other pollutants which contribute to acid rain, in specific regions where industrial emissions largely contribute to acid rain. Businesses in this area are allocated permits to emit some fraction of the overall total allowable pollution level. Companies which keep their emissions below the allocated level may sell or lease their surplus permits to other firms or use them to offset excess emissions in other parts of their own facilities (Stavins & Whitehead, 1992, p. 10). Thus, businesses possess an economic incentive to reduce their emissions below the fractional amount allotted to them. The 1990 amendments pr
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Stavins Whitehead, Air Act, Congress EPA, Brenner Beale, Act EPA, Reagan Bush, whitehead 1992, stavins whitehead, stavins whitehead 1992, EPA Journal, Agency Act, command-and-control approach, clean air, Clean Air, reilly 1991, clean air act, Nation's Business, air act, mckee 1991, reilly 1991 3, 1991 3, pollution control, 1992 10, whitehead 1992 10, whitehead 1992 9,
Approximate Word count = 1827
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$