Creative Thinking and Leadership Behavior
NATURE OF THE STUDY
Introduction
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Is degree of leadership behavior related to degree of creative thinking? This study will examine for the answer to this question by assessing leadership and creativity in a sample of graduate business students (all of whom are managers) and testing for a significant positive correlation between the measures of the two factors. However, as introduction to this research it is helpful to first define the key terms of "leadership" and "creativity."Unfortunately, as has been pointed out by Yukl (1981), existing theory and research offer no clear consensus regarding the term "leadership." For example, leadership has been defined in several ways. The most prominent of these definitions include definitions of leadership as: (1) the behavior of an individual directing a group toward a shared goal (Hemphill & Coons, 1957); (2) interpersonal influence wielded via communication toward the attainment of a specific goal (Tannenbaum, Weschler & Massarik, 1961); (3) the initiation and maintenance of structure in expectation and interpersonal interaction (Stogdill, 1974); (4) interpersonal interaction in which one person persuades one or more others to attain a personally desired outcome (Jacobs, 1970); (5) a power relationship in which one prescribes behavior for others (Janda, 1960); and (6) an influence over and above mechanical compliance with the routine directives of an organization (Katz & Kahn, 1978).
. . .
al Model. The Hersey-Blanchard model of leadership (Hersey & Blanchard, 1977) is widely used in management training programs. The model addresses matching leadership style (e.g. structure or task-oriented, relationship-oriented, etc.) to what is termed the "maturity" of followers. The maturity of followers (subordinate maturity) is defined in terms of worker capacity to set high but attainable goals, the willingness to take on responsibility, and the possession of relevant education and/or experience. Since maturity is judged in relation to a given job task, a particular subordinate can be mature in one task but immature in another.
The Hersey-Blanchard model holds that there are two components to subordinate maturity: (1) job maturity (the technical knowledge, and task-relevant skills) and (2) psychological maturity (feelings of confidence and the willingness to accept responsibility). If a subordinate is highly mature, he or she possesses both technical competence and self-confidence for a given task. A low-maturity subordinate lacks both of these feelings.
The central feature of the Hersey-Blanchard model is that as follower maturity increases, a leader should rely more on relationship-oriented behavior and less on task
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Kouzes Posner, Fiedler Garcia, Practices Model, Timm Peterson, Busse Krepelka, Blake Mouton, Hersey Blanchard, Kerr Jermier, West Coast, Leadership Models, divergent thinking, leadership practices, kouzes posner, leadership behavior, effective leadership, posner 1987, leader behavior, kouzes posner 1987, leadership practices model, leadership practice, leadership style, practices model, cognitive resource theory, inspiring shared vision, five behavioral dimensions,
Approximate Word count = 9458
Approximate Pages = 38 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Creative Thinking and Leadership Behavior
NATURE OF THE STUDY
Introduction
|