Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Rap Musicians

This is an excerpt from the paper...

Popular entertainment has often come under attack by the establishment for one reason or another. For example, when Elvis first twitched his pelvis on national television, the cameras were told to only film from the waist up (Hull 17). Songs such as ôLouie Louieö and ôWake up, Little Susieö were also considered controversial when they first came out (17). Then, in 1966, a number of Christian groups believed that Beatles music was ôcorrupting the youthö and lobbied to have it banned from radio play (Hull 51). More recently, Rap and Hip-hop music, which grew out of a grassroots need to express the experience of a disenfranchised portion of the population, have also come under attack by certain groups who consider the lyrics to be inappropriate, corrupting, or otherwise politically incorrect. This paper will argue that it is the right of Rap musicians, just as it is the right everyone who lives in the United States, to be able to express themselves and their experiences freely, without fear of reprisal or censorship.

One of the most compelling reasons that Rap music should be free from censorship is that it is a First Amendment right to be able to express oneÆs self freely. Specifically: "Congress shall make no law . . . prohibiting . . .or abridging the freedom of speech" (www.nara.gov/exhall/charters/billrights). This amendment is not restricted to any specific class of people, nor does it limit free speech to that which is ôsensitiveö or ôpolitically correctö. I

. . .
sement parties in cities like New York, Los Angeles, Oakland, Chicago, and Miami (Hull 18). Rap was born in areas where there were large minority populations that were ôhard hit by economic decline, unemployment, crime, and drugsö (Hull 18). As the disc-jockeys at these parties ôsampledö from one dance mix to another, intermixing it with their patter and rhymes, a voice was found for this part of American society that had felt ostracized to a large extent. As Hull asserts, ôRap's rhyming talk, which spoke of life in the inner city, began to express strong racial and political awarenessö (19). Additionally, although some rap lyrics have been attacked as ôracist, misogynist, anti-Semitic, sexually explicit, and violentö (19), there are scholars who maintain that rappers are the urban storytellers of the ghetto. They are simply ôexpressing real-life experiences and exposing the conditions of life in the ghettoö (19). That being the case, this is even more of a reason to let rappers ôspeakö û because there is need for this reality to be heard by the general public - so that it will no longer be allowed to ignore these sweeping social problems. This presents a third reason that rappers should be allowed the Constitutional right f
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Miami Hull, Wayne University, Portland Oregon, Rap Hip-hop, Specifically Congress, African American, ACLU FBI, Parker C01, , Little Susieö, rap musicians, freedom speech, free speech, argue rap musicians, musical expression, auburn university, ku klux, klux klan, mock lynchings, heard rap, ku klux klan, abridging freedom speech, argue rap,
Approximate Word count = 1259
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$