Activity Based Costing (ABC)
History of Activ
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Cost effectiveness is a key element of business competitiveness (Goulden & Rawlings, 1997). In the competitive business environment, management needs accurate information for decision making. That information traditionally has come from the accountants who analyze the company's records for controllable expenses. Since the 1970s, or roughly the same time frame that the Japanese began developing their JIT manufacturing ("Just in Time") the topic of Activity Based Costing (ABC) has been discussed at length in management literature. One of the more astute observers of ABC trends and techniques, Paul Sharman, describes the concept thus. "An approach known as activitybased costing (ABC) can provide management with relatively accurate overhead attribution to product cost and therefore a better understanding of profitability. ABC also provides cost information on major activities undertaken by the business as well as the cost of business processes, all of which can be captured in a comprehensive cost model relatively cheaply" (Sharman, 1992, 13). Let us consider a typical example that will clarify the power of ABC. Assume as a model that there is a production line, in which a component, "E," is assembled from four other components, A,B,C, and D, and two workers are assigned to the station. In the pre-ABC accounting concepts, the accountant would consider the cost of labor times a 40-hour week and the divide that figure by the cost
. . .
e taxing when you consider functions such as purchasing, business systems, materials planning, human resource functions, and accounting. The way to think about solving the problem, however, is with a simple rule: cost activities, not products" (Sharman, 1992, 15).
Traditional cost systems err in assuming that overhead activities are consumed equally by all products relative to volume produced (Goulden & Rawlings, 1997). They further err in assigning all costs to all products, relying on a dated concept that current output is the prime consideration in current overhead costs.
Sharman says that "conventional thinking holds that the inaccuracy is not relevant because in total all costs are accounted for, and on average the relative distortion in margin reporting can not be significant" (Sharman, 1997, 14). In greatly simplified terms, ABC divides overhead costs into two categories: "business sustaining" and "business producing." An example would be a software company that manufactures a certain product.
The actual software the codes and the interfaces is provided by engineers and programmers, who are, in this case, the "business producers." Yet without overhead assigned to the business "sustainers" (marketing, ship
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Goulden Rawlings, ABC Assume, Company X's, Paul Sharman, Management Company, Company Company, Specific Examples, Motor Company, Costing ABC, Production Management, sharman 1992, spark plugs, rawlings 1997, goulden rawlings, business sustaining, goulden rawlings 1997, cost objects, sharman 1992 13, bill activities, 1992 13, company manufactures, 61 cents, 81 cents plug,
Approximate Word count = 1225
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)
|