PREVENTIVE MEDICINE & HEALTH CARE REFORM
Egger
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Eggert and Parkinson (1994, pp. 688 693) argue the case for a prominent role for preventive medicine in any post reform health care system in the United States. The argument is logically attractive and relevant to the contemporary health care reform debate, for there can be no better way can to improve the overall state of health in the United States while simultaneously reducing the massive expenditures on health care in this country than the prevention of disease, injury, and to the extent possible conditions associated with genetic factors and human aging.Valid objectives such as quality control in health care, the provision of universal access, and the promotion of generalism over specialization in American medicine have tended to place a lower priority on consideration of an objective to increase the emphasis on preventive medicine (Schroeder, Zones, and Showstack, 1989, pp. 803 812). The objectives that are being emphasized, however, together with the goal to reduce the costs of health care in the United States, either will not be attained or such attainment will be limited in the absence of a sound preventive maintenance element in the delivery of health care. The objectives of preventive medicine are to protect, promote, and maintain health, and to prevent disease, disability, and premature death (Hersey, Boudreau, and Zeid, 1992, p. 6). Eggert and Parkinson (1994, pp. 688 693) point out that the Healthy People 2000 report issued by the federal Department of
. . .
apita basis) than that in the United States for limited access health care, the opponents of the single payer system need some argument the demean the single payer system in the minds of the American people. The strategy chosen by these opponents of the single payer system is that the advantages attributable to the single payer system can be gained only through a trade off for poorer quality health care (Detsky, 1994, pp. 805 806). This blatant claim is made by the opponents of a single payer system and this argument is bought by a surprisingly large segment of the American population in the face of incontrovertible that satisfaction with the quality of health care in Canada is higher than satisfaction levels in relation to health care in the United States (Schiff, Bindman, and Brennan, 1994, pp. 803 808).
The most telling arguments presented by Schiff, Bindman, and Brennan (1994, pp. 803 808) are those related to the claims that the quality of American health care is the highest in the world. Schiff, Bindman, and Brennan (1994, pp. 803 808) contend that it "is unthinkable to label our current system as 'highest quality' given its frequent failure to provide such basic services as immunizations or prenatal, primary, and preven
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Eggert Parkinson, Bindman Brennan, Porter Brown, United Opponents, Business School, Zones Showstack, health care, Business Review, Medical Association, Diamond Rabinowitz, 1994 pp, preventive medicine, University Harvard, care system, health care system, single payer system, brown 1994, parkinson 1994, american medical association, eggert parkinson, brennan 1994, 1994 pp 131 141, journal american, journal american medical, porter brown 1994,
Approximate Word count = 1739
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on PREVENTIVE MEDICINE & HEALTH CARE REFORM
Egger
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
