Genetics & Environment
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The nature vs nurture debate has persisted for many years in biological, genetic, sociological and philosophical circles, and has not yet been settled. There is strong evidence in both directions and while new developments in the field of genetics are constantly discovering genetic susceptibilities and tendencies, it is hard to believe that nurturing does not have a profound effect on the human being and the way they behave. Richard Lewontin, an American evolutionary biologist, geneticist and social commentator believes there is more to human evolution than the view of evolutionary psychologists such as Edward O. Wilson and Richard Dawkins (author of The Selfish Gene) who see the survival of the gene as the most important feature of evolution (Richard, 2005). Lewontin believes that there must be a careful understanding of the whole organism as well as its environment (Richard, 2005). He says that a niche does not exist in isolation: it is acted on and defined by its occupier. Lewontin believes the genetic view is an oversimplification and he questions the heritability of human traits such as intelligence as measured by IQ tests and Bell curves in several articles and in his book, co-authored by Steven Rose and Leon J. Kamin, Not in Our Genes. Studies have shown that the stimulation parents and caregivers provide to children in their first three years of life sets the stage for effective, productive communication skills (Baby, 1999). Researchers at the University
. . .
ever, the offspring of the attentive mothers raised by neglectful mothers also had high scores, showing the effect was not totally due to nurturing.
In earlier studies, these researchers had shown that offspring whose mothers licked and groomed them relatively often and nursed them in a certain arched-back position became less fearful than the offspring of reserved mothers (Nurture, 1999). These personality differences could have been due to either nature or nurture, so they put offspring of less attentive mothers with attentive foster mothers and found that they also coped better in stressful situations. Also, the pups own offspring were more attentive mothers themselves. The fearfulness of the pups was tested by timing how long they spent exploring or staying in one place within a controlled open-field area. The researchers concluded that the mother's behavior in the early days of the pups' lives influenced their personality. They add that in humans, the social, emotional and economic context in which a child is raised influences the quality of the relationship between the child and its parents, and this shows continuity across generations.
In a review of 30 years of experiments with Rhesus monkeys, looking at early
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Meaney Activity, Medical Center, Life Babies, Retrieved Dec, University Colorado, Selfish Gene, , Genes Studies, Lewontin American, University Delaware, 14 2005, dec 14, dec 14 2005, retrieved dec, retrieved dec 14, attentive mothers, nature nurture, feral children, sex differences, panic disorder, non-aggressive antisocial behavior, antisocial behavior, wallen 1996, offspring attentive mothers, behavioral sex differences,
Approximate Word count = 1974
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
|