Political Transition

The primary objective of this article is to address the issue of how to fulfill a political transition in a dictatorial nation from dictatorship to democracy, with lessons learned from the experience of South Korea and other countries. Przeworski offers a purely political analysis of regime transition. Economic and sociological factors are not considered major factors in regime change. Instead, political players are vested with nearly autonomous choice in deciding when and how to make the transition from an autocratic government to some other form of government. The element of choice granted to political leadership may shift in the course of the transition to other groups in society, and thus steal the momentum of change away from the leadership. Depending on which groups this shift in political decisionmaking shifts to will determine the final outcome of regime transition. If large elements of society mobilize and demand democracy, a democratic regime could result either peacefully (if the political leadership decides not to resist) or violently through revolution (if the political leadership attempts to repress the social movement). In short, Przeworski's theoretical framework consist of a strictly political dimension in which the state is structured according to the i

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Summary Przeworski, South Korea, Comments Przeworski, Theoretical Background, Games Transition, , References Przeworski, regime change, Eds Issues, political leadership, regime transition, democratic regime, Adam Przeworski, University Press, transition authoritarian regime, economic social, political system, change party, broadened dictatorship, competitive representative regime, party control, authoritarian regime democratic, ruling elite, regime democratic regime, change party control,
Approximate Word count = 1020
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Political Transition