f class struggles, but, rather, that his understanding of the biblical narrative is one of liberation, from which he sees Marxism as derivative (p. 37).
It is difficult for this writer to approach the text without stumbling over the fact that while Myers claims to be a Christian, his rhetoric, his philosophy, is not convincing. If he is not a Christian, then his work cannot be accepted as valid for use in interpreting the Gospel. When he writes that biblical faith insists that God is the author of the story contained in Mark, he remarks that he is not "anxious" to enter into "metasymbolic" debates, thus
...