1. The maximalist position argues that an overlooked problem is reaching epidemic proportions and that dire consequences will occur if it is ignored and unless drastic steps are taken. The minimalist position, conversely, holds that the maximalist position is grossly inflated for self-serving or special interest group purposes (Karmen, 2004). Minimalists argue that spending more money and effort on a problem is not warranted by its rate or incidence, whereas the maximalist position holds that if such efforts are not made a bad problem will worsen.
In the case of missing children, maximalists argue that under-reporting has occurred and that kidnapping of children has become frighteningly common. Minimalists believe that the true score of this problem is blown out of proportion by legitimately frightened parents. In the case of child abuse, similar views prevail and minimalists further suggest that expanding the definition of "abuse" to include parental disciplinary measures that are not inherently abusive has exaggerated the issue and that increased reporting presents an inaccurate picture of a problem that is not increasing per se (Karmen, 2004). With respect to spouse abuse, data tends to support the maximalist position that domestic violence is an extremely serious problem demanding social and governmental action; minimalists believe that data support the position that the incidence of such abuse is over-rated and that domestic violence is declining in frequency overall (Karmen, 2004). Similar arguments vis-a-vis date rape are presented from both sides of the debate.
Overall, I would argue that the maximalist position is valid in the cases of child abuse, missing children, and date rape. These crimes are often under-reported and demand special attention. Such problems affect all segments in society. In the case of domestic violence, however, targeting interventions to the most vulnerable populations is needed. Data d...