Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Learning Centers

This is an excerpt from the paper...

LEARNING CENTERS FOR LEARNING-DISABLED AND AT-RISK

In 1975, Congress passed the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (Public Law 94-142) which mandates an appropriate public education for all disabled children. The law provides for an evaluation of each child's needs and the design of an appropriate program for the involvement of parents in the design of their children's education, and for the allocation of necessary funds. Eight out of ten children in special needs programs are mentally retarded, learning-disabled, or speech impaired (Taylor, Asher & Williams, 1987)

The legislation on special needs children recommends mainstreaming defined as the integration of disabled and nondisabled students as much as possible (Taylor, Asher & Williams, 1987). Under mainstreaming, disabled children are in regular classes with nondisabled youngsters for all or part of the day instead of being segregated in special classes (Taylor, Asher & Williams, 1987).

Regarding the efficacy of the laws for special needs children, Gartner and Kerzner-Lipsky (1992) report that:

The positive contributions...are unquestionable in that all students do have access to programs, there is a general recognition and acceptance of entitlement to education of students identified with a disability, due process rights exist for students and parents, and many more students have been mainstreamed, especially in nonacademic areas. (p. 1)

. . .
learning disability students where the key emphasis was upon language and experience. The learning center described by Fried (1990) was planned around three important language arts experiences: conversation, storytelling, and the language-experience arts (e.g. drama). Paraprofessional assistance was utilized as well as team teaching. Results evaluated by individual interview and standardized test achievement indicated that the center was doing an exceptional job in meeting the reading deficiencies of the pupils. Specifically, the reading achievement levels of students exposed to the center showed significant increases. The use of a learning center for learning disabled students at the Dowling Urban Environment Learning Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota has been reviewed by Raison (1995). He notes that the center serves a fully inclusive, racially mixed, middle school and concludes that providing center services is expensive but well worth the cost. This conclusion is based on a comparison by Raison of evaluative data with data collected at an ineffectively managed middle school without a learning center. According to Raison (1995), the learning center functions efficiently because it has a clearly defined purpose and c
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Gabria Sloan-Mittiga, Gartner Kerzner-Lipsky, School District, According Cooper, According Graybill, Cox Wilson, According Burden, According Raison, Class Specifically, Restrictive Environment, learning center, learning centers, learning disabled, special education, disabled students, middle school, learning disabled students, effective learning, restrictive environment, pl 94-142, regular classroom, effective learning centers, eric document reproduction, implementation pl 94-142, learning disabled at-risk,
Approximate Word count = 3732
Approximate Pages = 15 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Learning Centers

Learning Centers in Elementary Schools 1144 words
TRUANCY IN AMERICAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2246 words
De Facto School Segregation 9029 words
Distance Learning Education 7302 words
Action Learning 3704 words
Educational Technology in the Year 2010 1205 words
Ombudsman Alternative Education Programs 1419 words
LANGUAGE DELAYED LEARNING DISABLITY 866 words
Gang Prevention 4369 words
USE OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING ACTIVITIES 4142 words
Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW