Bias Against Asian-Americans

In July of 2003, a mentally disturbed 25-year-old Vietnamese mother of two, Cau Bich Tran, was shot and killed by San Jose, California, police officer Chad Marshall in front of her boyfriend and young sons (Gathright A21). Marshall was brought to the Grand Jury, which heard testimony that resulted in a refusal to indict the officer for murder or manslaughter after seven days of testimony during a rare public grand jury probe of the incident, in which Officer Marshall testified that he was forced to shoot Tran because she was wielding an "edged weapon" which she refused to drop. Officers had been called to the scene because one of Tran's children was seen wandering alone on the streets; when arriving at the victim's apartment, the officer was told by her boyfriend that she "was crazy," and Officer Marshall claimed to have acted in self-defense after warning her to drop the weapon (Gathright A21).

Response to this shooting was immediate. Asian-Americans in general and Vietnamese-Americans in particular claimed that this was merely the latest in a long string of official violence directed against members of their community by authorities (Gathright A21). At issue was the question of whether Marshall and other officers acted too hastily, failed to analyze the situation, and ultimately acted in a manner that led to the death of a woman who was not dangerous and who could easily have been subdued (Gathright A

. . .
ts than citizens and that laws have restricted immigrants' rights to own property, obtain employment, receive public benefits, and to participate in political life. California's Proposition 187, for example, would, had it not been enjoined by the courts, eliminated access to public education, services, and non-emergency medical care for undocumented immigrants in the state. Proposed welfare reform at the federal level would, should it be passed into law, deny public benefits such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and food stamps to lawful, permanent resident immigrants. The problem is that in the United States, civil rights and the full protection of the laws are extended only to citizens. For Asian-American immigrants who have not acquired citizenship, denial of certain basic citizenship rights marginalizes members of the community and places them at risk for discrimination. However, Ancheta (2, 47) does note that immigrants, including undocumented ones, do have the legal right to due process and equal protection and federal laws provide rights and remedies for immigrants who face discrimination based on race, national origin, religion, gender, and other traditional grounds. The problem is that Asian-Americans are r
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Income SSI, Gathright A21, Angelo Ancheta, United Tran, Caucasian Americans, Lynette Clemetson, A9 Ancheta, Conclusion Ancheta, Ho Lee, Officer Marshall, san jose, gathright a21, ancheta 2, hate crimes, model minority, officer marshall, public policy, grand jury, ancheta 2 47, san francisco, 2 47, asian-americans female asian-americans, san francisco chronicle, refusal indict officer, fastest growing ethnic,
Approximate Word count = 1751
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)