Ad hominem fallacy
This is an excerpt from the paper...
An ad hominem fallacy was originally considered an appeal to authority and has only recently been considered as ad hominem fallacy (Ad, 2005). It consists of asserting that the claim made by someone else is wrong, and attacks the claim because of some trait of the person rather than on the facts of the matter. For example, if A makes a statement B, then C attacks A as being an unreliable person, or not knowing the subject B well enough to talk about it. C does not concern themselves with whether or not B
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Refutations Ad, , Retrieved July, ad hominem, References Ad, ad hominem fallacy, hominem fallacy, Ad Hominem, hominem tu quoque, ad hominem circumstantial, ad hominem fallacies, july 6 2005, hominem tu, 6 2005, july 6, tu quoque, retrieved july, siris 2004, hominem circumstantial, ad 2005,
Approximate Word count = 343
Approximate Pages = 1 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Ad hominem fallacy
|