Language Dysfluency
I. Introduction. The inc
This is an excerpt from the paper...
I. Introduction. The incidence of idiopathic speech and language dysfluencies and that of acquired speech and language dysfluencies can be distinctly differentiated as regards etiology. Acquired stuttering begins typically subsequent to some form of trauma to the head, resulting in brain damage and speech and language dysfluency.II. Communication Breakdowns. Given head trauma as one cause of learning disabilities, language-learning disabled children earned a mean of 0.56 in conversation and narration communication breakdowns. III. Perinatal Brain Damage. Children who had experienced perinatal brain damage evidenced several speech and language impairments when compared with their controls. IV. Suspected Phenobarbital Addiction. The subject presented echolalia and echopraxia and evidenced 2,087 reiterations within a total speech sample of 5,489 words. V. Alzheimer's Patients. Alzheimer's patients were found to rate lower means for immediate retelling of a story, etc. than their well-elderly counterparts. VI. Discourse Cohesion and Coherence, Patients were diagnosed as being in the early, middle and late stages of Alzheimer's Disease, with attendant dysfluencies. VII. Coordination Mechanisms. The production of speech entails a systems approach in which there occurs feedback information to control the output. VIII. Conclusion. Researchers conclude dysfluency due to trauma. The incidence of idiopathic speech and language dy
. . .
t 1 scored 12 for initial learning comprehension, 12 for initial learning production, 7 for mastery of comprehension and 7 for mastery of production. In contrast, Control 1 scored 12 for initial learning comprehension, 11 for initial learning production, 11 for mastery of comprehension and 7 for mastery of production. Thus, the results of this study indicate that brain-injured subjects perform below their controls for all language aspects, with the exclusion of phonology.
Suspected Phenobarbital Addiction
Lapointe and Horner (1981) discovered speech and language dysfluency in a subject who presented echolalia and echopraxia, sleep disorder, impaired gait, flat affect, and a tentative diagnosis of simple schizophrenia subsequent to suspected phenobarbital addiction. Given 7 speech tasks (i.e. verbal formulation, conversational spontaneous speech, picture description, sentence reading, paragraph reading, automatic speech, and repetition of phrases and sentences, the subject evidenced 2,087 reiterations within a total speech sample of 5,489 words. The subject evidenced 52% of reiterations for verbal formulation; 26% for conversational spontaneous speech; 14% for picture description; 8% for sentence reading; 11% for paragraph
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Ripich Terrell, Feldman Holland, MacLaghlan Chapman, Borden Harris, Lapointe Horner, Luchsinger Malmberg, Howie Neilson, Vocabulary Test, Alzheimer's Disease, Disease MOAD, speech language, fa subjects, ad subjects, communication breakdowns, brain damage, journal speech hearing, speech hearing, hearing disorders, moad subjects, miad subjects, conversation narration, speech hearing disorders, perinatal brain damage, borden harris 1980, mean miad subjects,
Approximate Word count = 2775
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Language Dysfluency
I. Introduction. The inc
|